stewie griffen
Make me an Admin!
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2005
- Posts
- 87,465
- Reaction score
- 39,347
- Location
- Firing GarPax
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Chicago Bulls
- Thread starter
- #976
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 4
SuperCoach Rd 4 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 4 AF Trades - AFF Talk - Capt/VC
I mean they brought the restricted area in for the reason I'm talking about, because guys were planting themselves too close to the bucket and endangering the guys with the ball. The difference between a legal charge and undercutting someone is extremely marginal and negliable most of the time, it's pretty rare there's a guy who's set for anything more than half a second before a collision happens where it's some egregious fault of the guy trying to make a positive play with the ball. I got no problems with guys who are the primary defender staying in front of a guy and drawing them, I just don't like the rule the way it is and how it promotes guys to instead of contesting shots as the help defender to instead jump there a split second before a guy gets there, plant their feet and get run over. Even just from an entertainment standpoint I'd much rather see a guy trying to score over another guy then seeing someone getting bowled over and rewarded.There's a difference between taking a charge & tunnelling (or "sliding under" as you called it earlier)... And guess what? The rules of the game differentiate between the 2 as well.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I mean would you rather see stuff like this...
https://v.cdn.vine.co/r/videos/9466...p4?versionId=iAiQsyxoRl60YSAERZuT0DMyNI_j9H4y
or this...
Here's one in a crucial spot from the Sixers 1st game of the season that went to a review that was upheld as a charge, a guy who's picked up his dribble and in his gather while another guy comes and jumps in front of him and hold his balls while he gets run over
And here's one from Ilyasova yesterday where he just jumps in front of Lillard after he's picked up his gather and is going up
https://3ball.io/plays/lillard charge?playId=0021600641_539
It's garbage and shouldn't be a thing.
But on the other hand, Derek Fisher has five rings...
I mean would you rather see stuff like this...
It's garbage and shouldn't be a thing.
Hes a completely flawed player. Put him in the nbl/ect he'll slay anyone because hes good at what he can dom but you cant get away with being as flawed as he is in the NBA
Embiid. I love the dude, But thats a charge.I mean would you rather see stuff like this...
https://v.cdn.vine.co/r/videos/9466...p4?versionId=iAiQsyxoRl60YSAERZuT0DMyNI_j9H4y
or this...
Here's one in a crucial spot from the Sixers 1st game of the season that went to a review that was upheld as a charge, a guy who's picked up his dribble and in his gather while another guy comes and jumps in front of him and hold his balls while he gets run over
And here's one from Ilyasova yesterday where he just jumps in front of Lillard after he's picked up his gather and is going up
https://3ball.io/plays/lillard charge?playId=0021600641_539
It's garbage and shouldn't be a thing.
No idea, NBA.com charts charges drawn (both play and team) but as far as committed ones I couldn't find any numbers on it, best I know of you can look through all the charges taken/committed from them from this site that highlights play https://3ball.io/plays/, spurs, chargeSorry, I can only see 1 of the 4 vids (the Durant one), so can't comment on them individually... It's definitely an interesting viewpoint you have. Obviously, I disagree with it. It would need a fairly major revamp of the rules to satisfy you.
Actually, are there stats on charges? I ask, as I don't reckon my Spurs are called for them a lot. I wonder if it's because they're often making that extra pass instead of trying the hero posterising dunk!? LMA was open for a reason late in OT when David Lee found him. Food for thought.
.



