Remove this Banner Ad

Analysis The Small Things

  • Thread starter Thread starter Portia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

How so? It's a ridiculous article for all along the spectrum.

Unless that's the point.

Huh?

We were talking about calling girls "moles" a few pages ago... lol
 
Most of the richest women are self made risk takers, that's how they made it, why would they suddenly become risk averse? Maybe they aren't risk averse, maybe they simply see it is not a realistic proposition.
There's a huge gap between "I don't want to invest my money in this thing" and "This thing can't make money".
 
There's a huge gap between "I don't want to invest my money in this thing" and "This thing can't make money".
There's also plenty of middle ground. Why hasn't it happened? Why wouldn't you take the chance if it's going to make money? What will the investor lose apart from money?

Why aren't Port and the Crows worried about such a thing? How did ANZ cope with sponsoring netball? What about the W League? The will is clearly there as community projects, but not as money spinners.

Ironically the clearest example of a sponsor getting burned in women's sport that I can think of was when Port were unceremoniously dumped by the Thunderbirds.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Huh?

We were talking about calling girls "moles" a few pages ago... lol
Oh sorry missed that! I tried to avoid this thread and did well until Gayle!
 
There's also plenty of middle ground. Why hasn't it happened? Why wouldn't you take the chance if it's going to make money? What will the investor lose apart from money?
Oh ok, so you don't know what appetite for risk is.
 
The great thing about casual racism, casual sexism, casual misogyny, the various casual sexual orientated-phobias is that because it's been so ingrained in the older generations culture that:

No matter how hard you try to convince them, they will never understand what they're doing is wrong.
 
Oh ok, so you don't know what appetite for risk is.
I have a laymans understanding yes, but you haven't identified the non financial risk. You have also applied the aversion to nearly every individual and corporation in the WORLD in regards to female sport. You are assuming the cultural values of all companies who have not invested in female sport do so for similar reasons...but you also haven't identified the reasons.


And just to clarify what we are discussing here as it's getting messy:

I am not arguing about whether female sport should be supported, I think it should AND I think so at the expense of much of the men's sport a la A league and the AFL women's teams.

My point is simply that there is not a financially viable argument for women to be paid the same in these sports (and many others), the evidence for which is the lack of investment outside of community style projects by companies and individuals. It is not a gender reason, but a financial one evidenced by the lack of female or any other investor.
 
Last edited:
The great thing about casual racism, casual sexism, casual misogyny, the various casual sexual orientated-phobias is that because it's been so ingrained in the older generations culture that:

No matter how hard you try to convince them, they will never understand what they're doing is wrong.

And collectively they do more actual damage than the crazy outliers.
 
The great thing about casual racism, casual sexism, casual misogyny, the various casual sexual orientated-phobias is that because it's been so ingrained in the older generations culture that:

No matter how hard you try to convince them, they will never understand what they're doing is wrong.

Do you seriously think this is mostly an age issue?
 
Huh?

We were talking about calling girls "moles" a few pages ago... lol
You didn't actually read the article, did you? Completely different type of mole being discussed there.
 
You didn't actually read the article, did you? Completely different type of mole being discussed there.

Carn, can't a guy make an idiotic pun anymore? This is PC gone mad farkin.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

"Ninny" for me.
You're one step away from bubble-headed booby.

Nimrod for me.

pulpfiction00004.png
 
Do you seriously think this is mostly an age issue?
It's an upbringing and ingraining issue. If you've been brought up being taught that casual derogatory remarks aimed at individuals different to yourself are normal and the longer you believe that what you're doing is acceptable the worse it gets. Over time it becomes so ingrained in yourself that someone telling you it's not acceptable anymore they take it as a personal attack.
 
Do you seriously think this is mostly an age issue?
Only in so far as it seems to be commonly accepted/expected by society that when you hit 40 you never have to change your mind again.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

It's an upbringing and ingraining issue. If you've been brought up being taught that casual derogatory remarks aimed at individuals different to yourself are normal and the longer you believe that what you're doing is acceptable the worse it gets. Over time it becomes so ingrained in yourself that someone telling you it's not acceptable anymore they take it as a personal attack.

I must be the exception that proves the rule. ;)

Seriously though and I have to mostly go by what I read some of the most vicious sexism around now emanates from young people.
 
I must be the exception that proves the rule. ;)

Seriously though and I have to mostly go by what I read some of the most vicious sexism around now emanates from young people.
Oh its there too, but you're less likely to get excuses about being too old to change, like thats an option to be.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom