Remove this Banner Ad

Mac Point Stadium! - "Tas Says Yes!"

What kind of stadium do you want?


  • Total voters
    216

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I'm not sure on the laws but is it possible for the federal government to override state government on the stadium.?
 
I'm not sure on the laws but is it possible for the federal government to override state government on the stadium.?
No they don't have any planning laws that override state laws.

But they do have $240m contribution that they can control, that they can say will only pony up if xyz happens.

When the northern half of MCG was redeveloped between 2002-06 for the Commonwealth Games the feds were going to make a $70m contribution to the $434m cost, but because Grollo signed a work place agreement with CFMEU, that Johnny Howard and his government mates didn't like, they pulled the pin on the $70m contribution, which I think Bracks replaced and a gave a bit more as well. $90m figure comes to mind.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

No they don't have any planning laws that override state laws.

But they do have $240m contribution that they can control, that they can say will only pony up if xyz happens.

When the northern half of MCG was redeveloped between 2002-06 for the Commonwealth Games the feds were going to make a $70m contribution to the $434m cost, but because Grollo signed a work place agreement with CFMEU, that Johnny Howard and his government mates didn't like, they pulled the pin on the $70m contribution, which I think Bracks replaced and a gave a bit more as well. $90m figure comes to mind.

its exactly what happrened.
 
By state political reporter Lucy MacDonald

- instantly dismiss

she's been so anti stadium since day 1
I still don't understand why the TPC had any say at all on the economics of the project. That's not the role of a planning commission as economic viability is not a planning concern.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I had someone recently tell me they wouldn't get the stadium built for any less that $2 billion. I would be interested to know what people's opinions are on this,I personally struggle to see a 23,000 seat stadium costing that much although I know the roof is expected to cost over $200 million alone.
 
this would set up a conflict re playing surface in the event cricket go all in on the venue
... which in turn could pressure cricket to finally commit to go all in on the venue now, instead of its present dithering, equivocating half-in, half-out stance ... or they may risk missing out altogether in favour of an A-League team, and as the years roll by, be stuck with an increasingly isolated and antiquated Bellerive Oval.
 
Last edited:
If this went to a vote to the public what do you think their response will be? If the people dont want it then no stadium should happen.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If this went to a vote to the public what do you think their response will be? If the people dont want it then no stadium should happen.
In Australia we elect officials to do that for us so we don't have to have a referendum on every single issue and policy.
 
Interesting findings by the Coordinator-General John Perry, who says "Macquarie Point stadium would be an economic boon for Tasmania"
This guy isn't some government lackie either. He's well credentialled based on article in The Mercury (former European business planning manager for American Airlines).

And it was an independent report he initiated himself after “watching the claims and counterclaims, questionable inclusions, and startling omissions” from debate around team and stadium.
 
Feel this issue should be up to the people
And the people spoke - at the July 19th election, at which the stadium was very much a hot issue.

Both Labor and Liberal parties went to the election supporting the project. Between them they got 65.74% of the votes.

As Jazny pointed out, that is how our system works - we vote for parties/candidates based on policy, without the need for separate public votes on individual projects or proposals.

 
Last edited:
In Australia we elect officials to do that for us so we don't have to have a referendum on every single issue and policy.
And in theory those officials are more expert or listen to expert with processes in place to get that information to the officials rather than the general public.
 
I don't think the report released today by John Perry doe's the stadium case much justice unfortunately. He did not include how much it will cost annually to pay off the $1 billion odd and also didn't include expected maintenance and running costs.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Mac Point Stadium! - "Tas Says Yes!"

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top