Remove this Banner Ad

The Vent Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Collingwood.:mad:

Choose Hille over Fraser, even though I thought Fraser would average more (just not play as many games).:mad:

Nathan Bock.:mad:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Haha to all those hacks that picked Hille and Simmonds over Fraser :D :D
 
Oh Cloke. So close to pulling the trigger. 3 more weeks to prove your a good Dter.
If you didnt notice, he had 24 rounds last year to do the same thing and he failed. Bad move picking up Trav.

Historically, only gonna get worse once Rocca is back next week.
 
It would be great to see a post from someone who has something like 148/5 or 430/10. Can't imagine it happening though - they are probably crying quietly in the corner.:D

I usually log my score on DT Talk regardless. It pisses me off as well as numerous times last year I thought I had stunk it up to end up coming down in the rankings.

How about when people state they have scored 2350 (eg) and the round winner is 2279 or something. NOw that is annoying - bloody frauds.
 
why the fcuk is joel corey playing half back, he was not in one centre bounce for the whole night bring in david johnson and get corey back in the guts

Inase you haven't noticed in the past 2 months, the cats have had some injuries and he plays half back a fair bit. Hopefully he will come down 100k in the next 3 weeks :)
 
lol he was my permanent reserve who would play every round . i thought he would get atleast 50. freking noob doesnt do shit. better than hill eh ;)

Whats the point of good friday if you cant sit back and watch some footy. get a match on good friday ffs!
 
I had Chapman (c) against Richmond he got 75 or something and then he gets 152 this week, but i changed my (c) to Kornes.

Swan got 130 last week and i swapped from him to Chapman who got me 75..

When i change my captain they kill it :( Kornes better get 130+
 

Remove this Banner Ad

One name.... Cloke :mad::mad::mad::mad:

Was never going to be a keeper. He can get shut down to easily, as most CHF, FF can these days. They dont go to power forwards much anymore because turnovers kill their sides going the other way. So teams try to give it to any player that is free.

Im starting to be unsure about picking up players such as Riewoldt, Pavlich and Franklin ect.
 
lol, no kidding. And in every 2nd post someone will say something along the lines of "450 from 5 players for an average of 90. Not happy :mad:"

heckin'g morons on here like to talk up their team so much they make out that 85-90 is not a good average. Who the fck do they think theyre kidding? The best part is when they say "600 from 5 players. Probably par score for me." :rolleyes:

Exactly, I am over their shyte, if i could average 85 per player per week for the next 8 weeks I would be very satisfied. 1900+ per week is a good start. majority have no ***king idea.

oh and I swore I was going to lock Gaz in for capt for the whole year, der, jumped on Kornes this week...:rolleyes:
 
That Heater report was bullsh*t, i hate those yellow/green/red/orange maggots. **** it was so easy when they just wore white!

And posting deliberately false and misleading information just before a lockout should be an immediate card. Two weeks in a row some cretons have posted something like Rocca's in for Beams or Cheney's rolled his ankle. It's not in the spirit of this board, take that childish crap to bay 13.

Bugga the 2 week ban, they should be given 6 months, and also blocked from viewing the site.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Exactly, I am over their shyte, if i could average 85 per player per week for the next 8 weeks I would be very satisfied. 1900+ per week is a good start. majority have no ***king idea.

oh and I swore I was going to lock Gaz in for capt for the whole year, der, jumped on Kornes this week...:rolleyes:

These bring up some interesting points

Is their no need to necessarily select a captain option from the start, because when G.Ablett scores a 80 or anything below 100 we jump off him for the next week and dont put him as captain. The whole point of having a captain to start with is so you select him each and every week unless injured and get the 110-115 points avg for captain.

So many wouldnt have had Gablett as captain because of last week.

Yeah also about the avg, thing. All you need to score 2000 each week is an 87 avg from your 22 players not very hard, when your cheapies, rookies avg about 80 between them.

87 x 23 = 2001 (all thats needed each week), until the big point games in the last 6-8 weeks.
 
this is my vent...

****ing ablett gets awarded a free kick in front of goal, but umpire calls advantage and stokes kicks the goal instead.

that's 9 points i could have had, plus ablett is my captain so its ****ing 18 points! that's like as many points as stephen hill will score this week!

ARGHHH!

i LOLed :D
 
These bring up some interesting points

Is their no need to necessarily select a captain option from the start, because when G.Ablett scores a 80 or anything below 100 we jump off him for the next week and dont put him as captain. The whole point of having a captain to start with is so you select him each and every week unless injured and get the 110-115 points avg for captain.

So many wouldnt have had Gablett as captain because of last week.

Yeah also about the avg, thing. All you need to score 2000 each week is an 87 avg from your 22 players not very hard, when your cheapies, rookies avg about 80 between them.

87 x 23 = 2001 (all thats needed each week), until the big point games in the last 6-8 weeks.

Well I didn't jump of Gaz this week because of last weeks score, I honestly think Kornes will rip a big one this week. Oh and I was thinking someone from the Pies might actually hold him down a bit, pffft that theory was arzeup.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom