- Aug 29, 2013
- 3,091
- 2,039
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
?path of least resistance...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
?path of least resistance...
Cant imagine a solution to it either. Perhaps that means I'm not imaginative enough!Yeah, I've always viewed this as a problem.
I think it would work if you imagined parallel universes. Lets say all these parallel universes existed outside of time (time didn't exist) and what we perceive as time is just the 'selecting' of a given frame. Time travel would then be simply selected a frame where your Delorean just happens to exist with you in it and the world around you just happens to look and be like 1955.Cant imagine a solution to it either. Perhaps that means I'm not imaginative enough!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Do you consider time travel to be traveling through every intermediate time from your origin to your destination?How does water travel through time and space as it traverses 4 co-ordinates of spacetime at t,x,y, z to 4 other different values of t,x,y and z ?
Whatever values we depict in the frame of reference, one thing tends to happen, takes the path of least resistance. Even lightening does the same in physical nature. If we can time travel in the way you wanted, path of least resistance will be part of that. However to start with our bias of looking at such a task through space bias or time bias needs to be addressed. That is not easy the way we are used to thinking of travelling in general. We tend to think of going from point A to point B and forget point A has 4 co-ordinates in spacetime and point B also has 4 co-ordinates.
This makes lots of sense to me.There would be another alternative where you literally had to have a teleportation booth already existing that kept a vacuum for you to teleport into. I'm not sure how the quantum vacuum fluctuation would fit into that. I think this is an interesting idea because it explains why we don't actually see time travelers visiting. It's because we haven't invented the booth yet, sort of like Alexander Graham Bell not being able to make a phone call until someone else had a telephone.
So to paraphrase, you're saying that if I were to time travel back to 2010 to see the pies win the flag again, I would need to travel "through" 2016,2015,2014....all the way back to 2010, and not "jump" those years back to my desired location?How does water travel through time and space as it traverses 4 co-ordinates of spacetime at t,x,y, z to 4 other different values of t,x,y and z ?
Whatever values we depict in the frame of reference, one thing tends to happen, takes the path of least resistance. Even lightening does the same in physical nature. If we can time travel in the way you wanted, path of least resistance will be part of that. However to start with our bias of looking at such a task through space bias or time bias needs to be addressed. That is not easy the way we are used to thinking of travelling in general. We tend to think of going from point A to point B and forget point A has 4 co-ordinates in spacetime and point B also has 4 co-ordinates.
So to paraphrase, you're saying that if I were to time travel back to 2010 to see the pies win the flag again, I would need to travel "through" 2016,2015,2014....all the way back to 2010, and not "jump" those years back to my desired location?
Also in the movie Terminator there is a ball of energy that pushes/destroys any existing material out of the way even solid objects.This makes lots of sense to me.
Do you consider time travel to be traveling through every intermediate time from your origin to your destination?
We do travel through time and can adjust our speed through time relative to other observers (relativity). I was asking if you viewed time travel only in terms of moving through a continuous set of points. Your answer to BustedWing answers that.Does time ever stand still, so to speak ?
How in reality, do we not traverse time ?
In relativity we only adjust our 'speed' through time not the direction we move in it.It should be noted, speed is a scalar, not a vector.
Ok. So what are you saying?Nope. I'm not saying that.
BTW - interesting discussion! A rarity on bigfooty.Ok. So what are you saying?
It did in school, especially when Miss Broughton was droning on and on.Does time ever stand still, so to speak ?
By the nature of it, you decided to go there after you had already been there. The space you occupy was already occupied by you from that moment, because while it was before you went there it was after you arrived there. You are merely fulfilling your own destiny.One challenge I have with time travel is something I call "occupation of space".
Say you have a time machine, and you want to go back in time to see your beloved Saints win the 1966 flag in person. You plug into the machine to appear out the front of the MCG at 10am on the last Saturday in September. But...what if that space on the footpath in 1966 Melbourne you appeared on already had a person standing there? or a newspaper stand? or a tree? Suddenly, and instantaneously, you AND the other person/newspaper stand/tree would be occupying the EXACT same point in space and time. Clearly death and a mangled mix of tree/time travelling human ensue.
Even "thin air" wouldn't work, as there are air particles,dust,even oxygen, hydrogen methane (and whatever other gasses make up our atmosphere) atoms are in "that space". Space you instantaneously shared when you travelled back to 1966. Your atoms, and those air atoms cannot both occupy the same space.
Cant wrap my head around how you fix that.
Only when God blows time on.Does time ever stand still, so to speak ?
How in reality, do we not traverse time ?
The things I wanted to do to Miss Broughton!It did in school, especially when Miss Broughton was droning on and on.
To answer the question, no time doesn't stand still , it is continually moving forward. It is the perspective of time that changes e.g my example above.