I agree with the bolded, have never disputed that.And why is that? Typically when high value players are traded, it's for quite a good return, even if that return is not of equal worth to the player that is lost.
Either way, it's pretty safe to assume that we would have kept the draft picks that had nothing to do with Tippett had the side deal never existed.
Most people here saw pick 23 as a nothing pick a month ago, whats changed now?



