Tom Roach

[Lindy]

Seems like he wont be a tiger next year, when i saw him play i though he did alright. maybe a rookie spot or a last pick??

 

[Jeremias]

Thought he showed quite a bit when he played. Would't take him in the draft, but I wouldn't object to takng him as a rookie, see how he goes.

 

[Kenny Hunter]

A dud , I wouldn't bother

 

[navier-stokes equation]

Year after year there are people on all Carlton boards who suggest we consider players who OBVIOUSLY ARE NOT UP TO IT

Can't people see our list is lacking A GRADERS

We have enough who aren't up to it as it is!

 

[HBF]

No

Thread.Over.

 

[blues4flag]

No more duds...please. He wasn't good enough for the Tigers, he's not good enough for us.

 

[Kooley]

just another example of a player who only got a chance because his old man was a champion.

no way

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

Who?

 

[Johnny_3]

yeah, we don't need players like roach. I think as a club we need to be looking for 16 or 17 yr olds like the tigers did 2 yrs ago and got raines. We need a player like raines/mcleod with good skils and pace, get hima yr early and watch him pile on the beef and improve, quality recruiting that would be

 

[Louie22]

Seems like he wont be a tiger next year, when i saw him play i though he did alright. maybe a rookie spot or a last pick??

ton

Why would carlton look at Tom Roach ?

 

[Bronx Bomber]

Seems like he wont be a tiger next year, when i saw him play i though he did alright. maybe a rookie spot or a last pick??

No. It would be more likely that he would get picked up by a team like Adelaide, West Coast or even Sydney....club who can take a risk on a player in the draft and it won't really hurt them if it doesn't come off. Carlton can't afford to take any risks in the draft, we need every player we draft to be quality.

And FWIW I believe with the depth of this draft delisted players will find it extremly tough to get re-drafted, actually I don't think there will be any.

 

[Johnny_3]

i doubt he will be picked up at all