Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BL v StK · WB v FRE · RIC v HAW · ADE v SYD · NM v COL · GWS v PA ·
Read the wrap-up and post your "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here.
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
Can't lose Smith and Busslinger
Would need to add GuldenIf we want to boost our midfield could we not trade Arty Jones for Chad Warner?
If we want to boost our midfield could we not trade Arty Jones for Chad Warner?
If Libba is retired and we lose Baz. I'd throw the kitchen sink at LDU. I read somewhere here he's a free agent.
He has looked average sometimes this year, don’t know how much of that is Norf getting to him or not.If Libba is retired and we lose Baz. I'd throw the kitchen sink at LDU. I read somewhere here he's a free agent.
I really like Ash buts he's more of a forwardWhat do people know/think about Ash Johnson? How is his tank? Is that something that can be worked on? He's real quick, so I'm wondering if he could work on his endurance and disposal. He has the attributes to be a good wingman.
On SM-G990E using BigFooty.com mobile app
Ew. Don’t think we need a slow mid who racks up low impact touches - probably won’t be cheap eitherIf Libba is retired and we lose Baz. I'd throw the kitchen sink at LDU. I read somewhere here he's a free agent.
Slow and low impact is definitely not how I’d describe LDU. Down on form this year but guy is a gunEw. Don’t think we need a slow mid who racks up low impact touches - probably won’t be cheap either
Slow & low impact. I think we're watching different players.Ew. Don’t think we need a slow mid who racks up low impact touches - probably won’t be cheap either
I'm expecting the Saints to throw stupid money at him. $1.5m pa money, they have cap and little class in the centre.Slow and low impact is definitely not how I’d describe LDU. Down on form this year but guy is a gun
They shouldn't be contracted for long periods. One year deal types.Gardner has a long contract still. He isn't going anywhere. Baker and poulter also contracted and not going anywhere.
Poulter has alot of upside, he was our best footscray signing and is exactly how we should should use the last spot on our list.They shouldn't be
He was very so so the week before.Poulter has alot of upside, he was our best footscray signing and is exactly how we should should use the last spot on our list.
Pre agent this year I think so would need to trade for him this year. Free agent next year but would be restricted due to the money he is on.If Libba is retired and we lose Baz. I'd throw the kitchen sink at LDU. I read somewhere here he's a free agent.
Slow and low impact is definitely not how I’d describe LDU. Down on form this year but guy is a gun
LDU has a terrific Robert Harvey-esque step but cherrypie is spot on - he’s slow.Slow & low impact. I think we're watching different players.
Cannot believe some of the things I see on this forum. A risk in not trading a draft pick.The idea a team handing us their F1 for pick 13 last was a “choice” we declined is even more unlikely and speculative than the scenarios you’re criticising. During the trade period, not a single R1 for F1 pick swap was executed. And other than ours, there was only one F1 traded in a pick swap and Port’s F1 only netted them two second rounders, pick 23 and an F2.
The trade isn’t just a mathematical equation you can run on an abacus. There was a distinct risk in not trading 13. Given the likelihood of a Croft bid before 13 and the risk attached with not trading it, it’s probably fairer to view the scenario as using 13 on Croft and the trade as 23 and F1 for 6.
You also have to factor in the bird in the hand aspect. We knew we would get Sanders or Watson at 6. It wasn’t a speculative trade. It was a trade for one of two specific players. Both distinct needs and also, evidently, very good.
Croft would have definitely been bid on before 13. GWS took crows pick before dogs pick and if dogs had held onto their pick would have bidded on Croft. GWS took Gothard that pick which wasn't rated that high in rankings next to Croft. I also don't doubt Essendon bidding on Croft like they did taking Lual before dogs could start matching bids.
Now if you read the post.....I said he shouldn't be signed up to a long term contract. I have no issue with him getting 1-2 year deals. He shouldn't be getting anymore than that. Having cloggers getting 3-4 years irks me massively.Poulter has alot of upside, he was our best footscray signing and is exactly how we should should use the last spot on our list.
Yes agree. But not on long term deals Harold.He was very so so the week before.
Needs to keep improving to make it,
Ok depth for now.