Tribunal got it right

[Bojangles17]

Full marks to the tribunal in suspending that little F@#! Baker for a couple of weeks, I still haven't forgotten that cowardly cheap shot he took on Johnson when he wasnt looking last year. From one cluster fu$%# of a decision to another , they at least got this one right

 

[TheBacko]

yes very pleasing to see baker get rubbed out, one of my most hated players. he is terrible at giving his evidence, and i don't expect his appeal to be successful. good to see stafford and raines get off too, nothing in staffords bump. good nite at the tribunal for richmond.

 

[beaver's army]

yes very pleasing to see baker get rubbed out, one of my most hated players. he is terrible at giving his evidence, and i don't expect his appeal to be successful. good to see stafford and raines get off too, nothing in staffords bump. good nite at the tribunal for richmond.

yea cant agree more. He has been a very cowardly player when playing richmond, will normally resort to hitting players when not looking behind the play.

 

[beaver's army]

I love how on the saints board they think he has a legit chance of getting off. he should of just taken the week smartest thing to do but i spose they arent so bright down there at moorabin.

 

[metallichris]

They didn't get this one right...

I can't see how anyone can be charged and suspended with "attempting" to strike. It's stupid. Kerr got one match for punch Sam Mitchell in the nuts, whilst Baker gets two for not even making contact with a bloke.

That should be rubbed out next year.

 

[Crumden]

They didn't get this one right...

I can't see how anyone can be charged and suspended with "attempting" to strike. It's stupid. Kerr got one match for punch Sam Mitchell in the nuts, whilst Baker gets two for not even making contact with a bloke.

That should be rubbed out next year.

You're sounding a bit like sideshow bob there metalman.

Sideshow Bob: Hah! Attempted murder? Now honestly, what is that? Do they give a Nobel prize for attempted chemistry? Do they?
​

Though I do agree that 2 weeks for what he did is pretty ordinary. But as one of my old school teachers used to say to me, "Crumden, even if you don't deserve the punishment this time I'm sure you've gotten away with something in the past you deserved this for". There's no doubt that sniping rat Baker has gotten away with plenty in the past.

 

[beaver's army]

You're sounding a bit like sideshow bob there metalman.

Sideshow Bob: Hah! Attempted murder? Now honestly, what is that? Do they give a Nobel prize for attempted chemistry? Do they?
​

Though I do agree that 2 weeks for what he did is pretty ordinary. But as one of my old school teachers used to say to me, "Crumden, even if you don't deserve the punishment this time I'm sure you've gotten away with something in the past you deserved this for". There's no doubt that sniping rat Baker has gotten away with plenty in the past.

agree last years hit on newman that required him to be carried of by trainers and then one had to run back on 5 min later to grab his mouth guard

 

[Heisenberg_]

i dont really think baker deserved 2 weeks for saturday but i do think he did deserve the suspension for his many many dog acts he has done in the past and got away with

 

[metallichris]

i dont really think baker deserved 2 weeks for saturday but i do think he did deserve the suspension for his many many dog acts he has done in the past and got away with

Sums up my feelings.

 

[Chops18]

yes very pleasing to see baker get rubbed out, one of my most hated players. he is terrible at giving his evidence, and i don't expect his appeal to be successful. good to see stafford and raines get off too, nothing in staffords bump. good nite at the tribunal for richmond.

Well said i have hated that little **** ever since a gave Johnno a cheap right hook how he only got 4 weeks for that and not 16 like danny williams is a disgrace.