Tribunal hates the dockers

[Mr Ripper]

Michele protested:
Dee_girl 19,

You Melbourne fans are so 'touchy' and defensive.

BWAHAHAHAHA! That coming from a North supporter!!! Takes one to know one, I guess!

 

[Michele]

Dee-gir9,

Ok so far? See you dee fans are 'touchy'.

Tripping is generally considered a 'serious' offence because of the serious injury that can be sustained.
Two scenarios - a player with no previous record, trips another player who has NOT had any reco's, and no injury is sustained to the that player. The tribunal finds the player guilty.
Scenario 2 - a player who has had 3 recos is tripped during the course of the game. His opponent is charged with tripping and found guilty by the tribunal.

Both incidents are equal in intent.

My question - would the tribunal give the 2 players found guilty equal sentences (suspensions)? Or would the player found guilty of tripping a player with 3 reco a heftier sentence?

I agree Schwartz was tripped; I am not sure that it warranted 2 weeks - unless that interpretation is given throughout the year.

Michele

NMFC 1869

 

[sabre_ac]

Originally posted by dee_girl9:
okay well for starters its 9 and not 19 so get it right ok.

I believe Sabre has a point. Maybe if the player was anyone but Schwartz (3 reco's), the Freo player may have received 1 week.

second of all i was just asking why does 3 knee recos make any difference, u said it yourself in brackets. r u saying he gets special treatment? cos i can sure as hell tell u he doesnt. i just want to know why u mentioned the knee recos thats all. geez !!!

Still going huh
Dees
Nearly a week later


How many times do i have to say
IM NOT INTERESTED