Remove this Banner Ad

Status in Question Tyson Stengle

  • Thread starter Thread starter sumavich
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Chris Scott spiked Stengle's drink so that he could use the way that the footy club responds and handles the matter as trade capital for Bailey and Clayton..
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The kids take Ket these days
So much better than cocaine. Way more fun, goes great with psychedelics/MDMA, and also it doesn't result in mass casualties like cocaine does. I think that's important. It's nice getting high knowing you haven't killed a whole lot of people to do it.
 
Season over if there was no Stengle yesterday. Tyson 'REDEEMED' Stengle rewards the show of faith in him once again.

"What I will say is he is a monumental success story, that kid, if you know anything about what he's had to overcome," Scott said.

"Yeah, we'll all be critical of people, making errors here and there. But with Tyson, you'll come away and go 'we should be proud of him'.

"Once we bring them (players) in, we've got their back. That's our responsibility.

"The easiest thing in the world is to take the moral high ground, turf them out."
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Last edited:
I just dont get how these contracts are structured that if a player fails to perform, i.e. actually dont turn up to work, they still get paid 100%.?

Its crazy.

Where is the penalty if a player makes poor choices or simply loses the desire to work? They still get paid for years more than the PM?
 
I just dont get how these contracts are structured that if a player fails to perform, i.e. actually dont turn up to work, they still get paid 100%.?

Its crazy.

Where is the penalty if a player makes poor choices or simply loses the desire to work? They still get paid for years more than the PM?
You would think clubs will make this a pre-requisite from now on. It’s happening far too often.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I just dont get how these contracts are structured that if a player fails to perform, i.e. actually dont turn up to work, they still get paid 100%.?

Its crazy.

Where is the penalty if a player makes poor choices or simply loses the desire to work? They still get paid for years more than the PM?
Yes, and no. I think there is a wellbeing aspect of it - you don't want to push players into continuing to come along and play through excessive financial penalty - but there's also, obviously, not wanting to be on the hook for the full whack if a player just stops taking care of themselves.

Obviously he'll lose all match payments, performance incentives, etc.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom