Review Ummm… embarrassingly bad Port v Freo

[Loony Juice]

Who touched it though?

The umpire called touched

No difference when a mark that is not a mark, a push in the back that is not etc, are paid.

Umpire made the call, the call has to stand

 

[Loony Juice]

If he did, then he gave Lobb, their other ruckman (forward) the 5 votes. Both coaches agreed that the two biggest blokes on the field were clearly the 2 most valuable players in the game.

I wonder if there might be a message there for Ken

Give the votes to short players?

 

[Papa G]

Lobb got his votes by destroying Aliir and kicking 5, not from his ruck work, but we do get the point.

 

[Jojay]

got the smile of a bloke who knows hes coaching port next year

Or interviewed for the norf gig on Friday

 

[Wombat24]

The umpire called touched

No difference when a mark that is not a mark, a push in the back that is not etc, are paid.

Umpire made the call, the call has to stand

That's right, the field umpire in the vicinity should have relayed the decision to the goal umpire. No review.

 

[Alyx]

As promised.

My personal favourite: "It's not his fault 2 players couldn't kick straight under pressure. He got them back to within 8 points".

So it's not his fault when players don't kick goals, but he deserves all the credit when they do?

A close runner-up was the person excusing yesterday's loss because twelve of our players are unavailable - including one who has played a single match, one who has played a single quarter, one who was dropped from the AFL side, one who will never play AFL again, and one who has yet to debut at AFL level.

True Believers are an absolute disease.

 

[Jonts]

As promised.

My personal favourite: "It's not his fault 2 players couldn't kick straight under pressure. He got them back to within 8 points".

So it's not his fault when players don't kick goals, but he deserves all the credit when they do?

A close runner-up was the person excusing yesterday's loss because twelve of our players are unavailable - including one who has played a single match, one who has played a single quarter, one who was dropped from the AFL side, one who will never play AFL again, and one who has yet to debut at AFL level.

True Believers are an absolute disease.

View attachment 1439728

The thing is

If we sacked him and appointed literal carrot these same people would be 100% behind the club

 

[Duck Farmer]

As promised.

My personal favourite: "It's not his fault 2 players couldn't kick straight under pressure. He got them back to within 8 points".

So it's not his fault when players don't kick goals, but he deserves all the credit when they do?

A close runner-up was the person excusing yesterday's loss because twelve of our players are unavailable - including one who has played a single match, one who has played a single quarter, one who was dropped from the AFL side, one who will never play AFL again, and one who has yet to debut at AFL level.

True Believers are an absolute disease.

View attachment 1439728

Top Fan: "I cHaLlEnGe AnYoNe To Do BeTtEr"

BF: "Ok. Let's sack Hinkley and give someone else a go."

Top Fan: "NoT lIkE tHaT!!!"

 

[Powerade 08]

As promised.

My personal favourite: "It's not his fault 2 players couldn't kick straight under pressure. He got them back to within 8 points".

So it's not his fault when players don't kick goals, but he deserves all the credit when they do?

A close runner-up was the person excusing yesterday's loss because twelve of our players are unavailable - including one who has played a single match, one who has played a single quarter, one who was dropped from the AFL side, one who will never play AFL again, and one who has yet to debut at AFL level.

True Believers are an absolute disease.

View attachment 1439728

lets sit back and watch the finals fistbumps you

 

[FutureShock]

As promised.

My personal favourite: "It's not his fault 2 players couldn't kick straight under pressure. He got them back to within 8 points".

So it's not his fault when players don't kick goals, but he deserves all the credit when they do?

A close runner-up was the person excusing yesterday's loss because twelve of our players are unavailable - including one who has played a single match, one who has played a single quarter, one who was dropped from the AFL side, one who will never play AFL again, and one who has yet to debut at AFL level.

True Believers are an absolute disease.

View attachment 1439728

Don't know whether to laugh or cry. I know it's stating the obvious, but these people are delusional morons!

 

[dirty2]

We have lost our club to Koch ken and the happy clappers.

 

[Andre]

We have lost our club to Koch ken and the happy clappers.

By design. We needed them after 2012 to ensure the club wouldn’t go under, but their numbers increased enough that the club thinks they don’t need diehards. Our high standards on awkward issues like winning premierships and fighting to celebrate our history when WE want to annoys them. Post-SANFL fans who don’t know/care they are being gaslight are the clubs ideal fan. We became Southern Power after all and most don’t even know it or care.

 

[PJ Power]

As promised.

My personal favourite: "It's not his fault 2 players couldn't kick straight under pressure. He got them back to within 8 points".

So it's not his fault when players don't kick goals, but he deserves all the credit when they do?

A close runner-up was the person excusing yesterday's loss because twelve of our players are unavailable - including one who has played a single match, one who has played a single quarter, one who was dropped from the AFL side, one who will never play AFL again, and one who has yet to debut at AFL level.

True Believers are an absolute disease.

View attachment 1439728

Our supporters are as deluded as pro-Trump Republicans.

 

[Steve Dore]

How's that 3 flags in 5 years looking?

very AFLW

 

[Loony Juice]

We have lost our club to Koch ken and the happy clappers.

Then it is time for us to take it back

For the greats who built this once Great Club

 

[JimmyBC]

Then it is time for us to take it back

For the greats who built this once Great Club

Storm HQ if need be.

 

[Powerage]

Run back the touched allowed goal and the tabenar mark touched by 20 people we win by 3 points lol .

This game of AFL is so manipulated it's not funny ..

Buy Gray and Marshall need to kick them goals

I can't believe a bigger issue is not being made of these two decisions which did almost certainly impact on the result of the match.

The call of touched by the field umpire just stands based on my understanding. The goal review system has not been put in place to adjudicate field umpire decisions. The goal is a point and we kick the ball out. Even the field umpire called for a review of whether the ball was TOUCHED ON THE LINE not whether it was touched of the boot. The review umpire had no ******* right reviewing that part of play.

The decision to call tabernars catch a mark was just wrong But you go by the rules. Certainly the umpire who called it a mark should have been suspended for several weeks though because it was a diabolically s**t call.

 

[sobrave]

As promised.

My personal favourite: "It's not his fault 2 players couldn't kick straight under pressure. He got them back to within 8 points".

So it's not his fault when players don't kick goals, but he deserves all the credit when they do?

A close runner-up was the person excusing yesterday's loss because twelve of our players are unavailable - including one who has played a single match, one who has played a single quarter, one who was dropped from the AFL side, one who will never play AFL again, and one who has yet to debut at AFL level.

True Believers are an absolute disease.

View attachment 1439728

I miss BUTTERS AND LLYSET

That was a damp brave effort though

 

[GremioPower]

As promised.

My personal favourite: "It's not his fault 2 players couldn't kick straight under pressure. He got them back to within 8 points".

So it's not his fault when players don't kick goals, but he deserves all the credit when they do?

A close runner-up was the person excusing yesterday's loss because twelve of our players are unavailable - including one who has played a single match, one who has played a single quarter, one who was dropped from the AFL side, one who will never play AFL again, and one who has yet to debut at AFL level.

True Believers are an absolute disease.

View attachment 1439728

No-hopers

 

[Grave Danger]

"I don't think getting rid of him and replacing him with clarkson is the solution to be honest"


I do.

 

[Alberton Proud]

As promised.

My personal favourite: "It's not his fault 2 players couldn't kick straight under pressure. He got them back to within 8 points".

So it's not his fault when players don't kick goals, but he deserves all the credit when they do?

A close runner-up was the person excusing yesterday's loss because twelve of our players are unavailable - including one who has played a single match, one who has played a single quarter, one who was dropped from the AFL side, one who will never play AFL again, and one who has yet to debut at AFL level.

True Believers are an absolute disease.

View attachment 1439728

There's years worth of material there

A couple of standouts

"Or do you or have ever played"

"LLYSET"

"Let's remember Fremantle are 4th and we aren't in the eight, so well done Power !"

"A damp brave effort"

 

[MrMeaner]

I'm not sure the happy clappers are a new phenomenon. There were rallies in support of Russ when he was sacked as coach. The difference now is the platform and the administration's propensity to listen to the mediocrity settlers.

 

[Alberton Proud]

LLYSET

 

[TeeKray]

Sllyset

 

[Loony Juice]

I can't believe a bigger issue is not being made of these two decisions which did almost certainly impact on the result of the match.

The call of touched by the field umpire just stands based on my understanding. The goal review system has not been put in place to adjudicate field umpire decisions. The goal is a point and we kick the ball out. Even the field umpire called for a review of whether the ball was TOUCHED ON THE LINE not whether it was touched of the boot. The review umpire had no ******* right reviewing that part of play.

The decision to call tabernars catch a mark was just wrong But you go by the rules. Certainly the umpire who called it a mark should have been suspended for several weeks though because it was a diabolically s**t call.

The field umpire closest to the play called touched, call stands. No review required.
The vfl are so unimaginative these days, at least come up with some interesting and unique ways to screw us over