Remove this Banner Ad

US Citizens - FCC Media "Deregulation" Deadline Nears

  • Thread starter Thread starter Former
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Former

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
May 16, 2001
Posts
8,062
Reaction score
22
Location
Brisbane
From zeldman.com - because he says it better than I can:

FCC deadline nears

In any other western democracy, it would be the subject of intense public debate and 72pt newspaper headlines. But this revolution is not being televised, and even the best newspapers barely give it a (column) inch.

As we noted 11 days ago, the FCC is about to overturn laws preventing unilateral ownership of mass media. The existing rules promote localism and diversity. They are the very embodiment of the FCC’s mission and charter. Yet the FCC is almost certain to roll over and give the media conglomerates what they ask. If it does, one or two big companies will control what you and your family can read, watch, or listen to.

There is still time to tell your representatives how you feel about the hijacking of public airwaves by a few powerful corporations. But there is not much time. Short of a miracle, the FCC will “deregulate” American mass media on 2 June 2003.
 
Why am I bothered? Because Howard has his nose fair up Bush's arse and will no doubt sign any treaty that says that we must do the same thing in Australia, though we're almost there anyway.
 
Sometimes I wish that I was a $100 bill instead of a person.
I'd get treated a whole lot better.
I'd be more respected.
I'd be allowed entry into any nightclub.
I'd get to travel the world.
Rappers would sing about me.
Wars would be fought over me.
I would be the root of all evil!
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I think that it is great for John Howard and Australia to have a great relationship with America. It might mean that we might get more things for free.
 
Originally posted by goaldrush
I think that it is great for John Howard and Australia to have a great relationship with America. It might mean that we might get more things for free.

Like what, steak knives??
 
Originally posted by goaldrush
I think that it is great for John Howard and Australia to have a great relationship with America. It might mean that we might get more things for free.

Huh?

Nope. Free trade, exports, imports. Things like that.

Explain free trade Suzi. Hell, explain exports!

:D :D :D
 
Originally posted by goaldrush
Nope. Free trade, exports, imports. Things like that.

Suzi, we don't want our exports to be free. That means that when we sell something to them, we don't get anything for it.

Also, I doubt George W Bush is going to give Australia free imports. A man who puts steel tariffs up is not someone inclined to give us a discount!

Also, free trade doesn't mean that it's free. Wish it did though...

But hey, why am I even responding? I am becoming increasingly convinced that you are someone's idea of a sociology experiment and I am merely something that is going in the "results" column!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Originally posted by Yianni
Suzi, we don't want our exports to be free. That means that when we sell something to them, we don't get anything for it.

Also, I doubt George W Bush is going to give Australia free imports. A man who puts steel tariffs up is not someone inclined to give us a discount!

Also, free trade doesn't mean that it's free. Wish it did though...

But hey, why am I even responding? I am becoming increasingly convinced that you are someone's idea of a sociology experiment and I am merely something that is going in the "results" column!

I think, she thinks that "free trade" means that we get stuff for free.

No, Suzi.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom