Remove this Banner Ad

NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 5

  • Thread starter Thread starter Werewolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is PART 4

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

The Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary and nastiness will be deleted and warnings issued.
 
I know how you choose to read it, but you've literally defined a liberal as someone that disagrees with Nazis, fascists, racists, misogynists, homophobes, transphobes and bigots.

Unfortunately, to appreciate why what you posted is dumb on so many levels, you would need to read it through our lens where being a Nazi or racist or fascist of misogynistic etc is actually a bad thing...so yeah, guess that means you'll never understand.
He means that liberals throw around these terms in an attempt to stifle discussion, especially when their position is untenable (which is most of the time).
 
Can you guess why it was after the leaking of that tape that almost all of the allegations against Trump appeared? People like Carroll were buoyed by the fact that his own words would make almost any allegation easy to believe.

How many of the 8 women who have made sexual assault allegations against Biden do you believe?

View attachment 2502851

IMG_0777.jpeg
 

The question I asked you was too hard was it? Why do you believe Jean Carroll but not Tara Reade? Do you think Biden grabbed her by the pussy or not? I thought Trump's private conversation in 2005 was just locker room talk but maybe what he said was true? Maybe a few decades ago women routinely did let powerful or influential men go too far. Maybe that's why Biden was so surprised when Tara Reade fought back when he digitally r*ped her.

 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The question I asked you was too hard was it? Why do you believe Jean Carroll but not Tara Reade? Do you think Biden grabbed her by the pussy or not? I thought Trump's private conversation in 2005 was just locker room talk but maybe what he said was true? Maybe a few decades ago women routinely did let powerful or influential men go too far. Maybe that's why Biden was so surprised when Tara Reade fought back when he digitally r*ped her.



Ummm…a jury, and an appeals court, believed Carroll.
 
Can you guess why it was after the leaking of that tape that almost all of the allegations against Trump appeared? People like Carroll were buoyed by the fact that his own words would make almost any allegation easy to believe.

How many of the 8 women who have made sexual assault allegations against Biden do you believe?
Well, I’m pretty sure you do, no matter what.
Believe them or not, the allegations were generally so trivial it was actually a stretch to describe them as “sexual assault.”
One of the many differences between these and the allegations against Trump is that, unlike him, Biden hasn’t provided a wide-ranging confession on tape.
This is your problem — you are trying to make a case that a man who has confessed to compulsive and repeated sexual assault would not have committed sexual assault. It’s not a strong position.
 
Ummm…a jury, and an appeals court, believed Carroll.

A jury believed one aspect of her claims and not another. As I said earlier, people like Carroll were buoyed by the fact that Trump's own words would make almost any allegation easy to believe and her lawyers flogged that Access Hollywood tape for all it was worth in court. If a similar tape of a private conversation had been unearthed of Biden like the one that was unearthed when NBC sent the call out to the network to find any dirt they could on Trump, then Tara would have succeeded in court against Biden as well. There was a lot more corroborating evidence for Tara's claims than there was for Carroll's. Her mother calling Larry King for advice the same year the incident occurred, a neighbour who recalled Tara confiding in her about the incident and a woman that worked in the same office as Reade talked about Reade confiding in her also. Reade's mother also urged Tara to go to the police at the time


Do you believe this woman or not?

untitled.jpg
 
The question I asked you was too hard was it? Why do you believe Jean Carroll but not Tara Reade? Do you think Biden grabbed her by the pussy or not? I thought Trump's private conversation in 2005 was just locker room talk but maybe what he said was true? Maybe a few decades ago women routinely did let powerful or influential men go too far. Maybe that's why Biden was so surprised when Tara Reade fought back when he digitally r*ped her.


It wasn’t me you asked, but here’s an answer:
Carroll demonstrated enough credibility for the encounter to be believed in the courts.
Reade has been shown to have little credibility. This piece from Politico makes it plain.
 
Well, I’m pretty sure you do, no matter what.

Actually that is incorrect. I distinctly recall saying earlier this year that I didn't believe Tara Reade but that was before I had looked more fully into her claims and the corroborating evidence.

Believe them or not, the allegations were generally so trivial it was actually a stretch to describe them as “sexual assault.”

hillary-laughing.gif

So when Biden forced Reade into an alcove, used his knee to force her legs apart, grabbed her by the pussy and then digitally r*ped her that wasn't sexual assault?


One of the many differences between these and the allegations against Trump is that, unlike him, Biden hasn’t provided a wide-ranging confession on tape. This is your problem — you are trying to make a case that a man who has confessed to compulsive and repeated sexual assault would not have committed sexual assault. It’s not a strong position.

Trump said on tape "I don't even ask ...." He dismissed this as locker room talk but we have Biden ON VIDEO not asking women for permission before proceeding to stroke their hair, massage their shoulders, whisper in their ears, kiss them, stroke them etc. Much of the same unwelcome, unwanted behaviour those 8 women complained about and more.
 
Last edited:
Actually that is incorrect. I distinctly recall saying earlier this year that I didn't believe Tara Reade but that was before I had looked more fully into her claims and the corroborating eveidence.

View attachment 2502882

So when Biden forced Reade into an alcove, used his knee to force her legs apart, grabbed her by the pussy and then digitally r*ped her that wasn't sexual assault?

Trump said on tape "I don't even ask ...." He dismissed this as locker room talk but we have Biden ON VIDEO not asking women for permission before proceeding to stroke their hair, massaging their shoulders, whispering in their ears, kissing them, stroking them etc. Much of the same unwelcome, unwanted behaviour those 8 women complained about and more.
I should have said... apart from the Reade allegation. It's a serious allegation, but I don't believe it happened. Reade has been shown not to be credible.
 
It wasn’t me you asked, but here’s an answer:
Carroll demonstrated enough credibility for the encounter to be believed in the courts.

Let's flesh this out a little. Perhaps you'd like to comment on whether the jury and more importantly the judge, did a good job in that case?

Reade has been shown to have little credibility. This piece from Politico makes it plain.

I didn't read anything in that hit piece that would steer me towards believing Reade has lied about Biden. Maybe I missed something though. What was the most compelling anecdote in the story that makes you believe Reade must be a liar?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I know how you choose to read it, but you've literally defined a liberal as someone that disagrees with Nazis, fascists, racists, misogynists, homophobes, transphobes and bigots.

Unfortunately, to appreciate why what you posted is dumb on so many levels, you would need to read it through our lens where being a Nazi or racist or fascist of misogynistic etc is actually a bad thing...so yeah, guess that means you'll never understand.
Would you consider calling the Press Secretary 'White House Barbie' misogynistic?
 
Let's flesh this out a little. Perhaps you'd like to comment on whether the jury and more importantly the judge, did a good job in that case?



I didn't read anything in that hit piece that would steer me towards believing Reade has lied about Biden. Maybe I missed something though. What was the most compelling anecdote in the story that makes you believe Reade must be a liar?
No thanks. I’m not remotely qualified to do that and I dare say neither are you.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

so what happens if I think that Biden is a probable rapist and also that Trump is a probable rapist? Does that make Trump not a rapist?

Trump lovers can't comprehend this. They think everyone supports politicians the way they support Trump.
 
so what happens if I think that Biden is a probable rapist and also that Trump is a probable rapist? Does that make Trump not a rapist?

You would need to sell your Biden hat, Biden watch, Biden shoes, Biden bidet, Biden flag and Biden laptop.
 
just-jail-anybody-who-was-to-the-island-v0-dqb6hi832h9g1.png
 
View attachment 2502737

President Autopen's son, cushioned by a pardon speaking about "avoiding consequences". It just doesn't get any more ironic than that.
Agreed mate. Hunter is a classic silver spoon elitist failson.

Now, any issues with his logic in that clip? Seems to have convinced the interviewer, fairly straightforward stuff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom