TennisPlayerAndy
Game #6 Klay
- Apr 1, 2008
- 57,878
- 102,042
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Raiders, GSW, QPR, NYM
Some big opinions in this thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's a school of thought that this whole Syrian thing is about getting troups on the ground and having a crack at Iran. We'll see how the mop flops with Russia. If Russia sticks with Iran then then we're all ****
Iran ? They're on the other side of the gulf . Didn't the US make an agreement with them not that long ago regarding nuclear power?
That was the Obama admin who did the deal. Trump has always been against Iran and this deal. Syria is filled with Iranian soldiers/ militias backing the Assad regime so I wouldn't be surprised if he did strike them.Iran ? They're on the other side of the gulf . Didn't the US make an agreement with them not that long ago regarding nuclear power?
Geneva Conventions.Turnbull calls on Syria to abide by the rules of war.
Really ? There are rules ?
1. Play nicely.
2. ?
Geneva Conventions.
Iran ?
Seriously though, **** war. What the **** is wrong with humans?
This planet could be awesome for everyone but it's ruined by greed and prejudice
Sad all around. Causes ? Too many to list. Solution ? Said it here before....comet / meteorite and start again. Or fly to the stars. Populate the galaxy. Beyond our means currently. Surely possible in the future. Can only hope.
This could very well be the most complex war. So many different players/nations/religious groups backing so many different regimes in one small little area.
It has the potential to go pear shaped very very ******* quickly. Especially when u throw in: Iranians, Russians, Saudis, America, the Assad regime and Isis.
It's really hard to see how this could play out in a way where there is not a lot of death and destabilisation in a region that is already on a knifes edge.
Not sure about the most complex. WW1 was extremely politically complex.
The thing is now, similar to WW1, the world is full of the types of weapons we've never seen used in a war. The people who will use them can only threorise the result. If this goes down was WW3, there'll only be cockroaches and NMFC scurrying around the earth.
I'm not really up on world war 1 history. Have only just started reading up on it in depth.
I spose my theory as to why it is more complex is due to the aggressive nature of those now in power and the arms that have available. You could literally destroy the planet in minutes if they decided to go all out