Okay, now I'd like to think I'm not being a so called 'negative nelly' here, and was very impressed with how our boys played, however I would like to make two honest points:
1. From the VERY start of the last term (when the players had just had a break long enough to contest at least early on), they went to absolute shit and did not perform anywhere near what we had seen for the other three quarters. 'Running out of legs' for mine does not constitute as an excuse here.
2. This is merely hypothetical, but I think it is reasonable to suggest that there is no way we would have given up ~40 points in the last quarter if the game was level at three quarter time. Okay so they got tired, but 40-50 points after three quarters of domination? Hmmmm...
It was obvious that the players knew they had it won and just sat on there asses. I don't want to see sugar-coating of this. Our inability to finish teams off was a problem right throughout Laidly's tenure and, combined with our always terrible percentage, represents to me a near enough is good enough attitude. A premiership is all that is good enough in the final analysis, and you will never win a premiership by just gifting 40 points and entire quarters to teams. Yes we won and I truly am very pleased with how all of our guys played (except 1 or 2), but that last quarter was a far-cry from the 'competitive' North that the club has been spruiking - it was instead a capitulation reminiscent of the St.Kilda game in rnd 2.
Okay now I prepare for the negative nelly posts etc... Seriously I really enjoyed that match and how all our blokes played... just the team as a whole really fluffed that last quarter.
1. From the VERY start of the last term (when the players had just had a break long enough to contest at least early on), they went to absolute shit and did not perform anywhere near what we had seen for the other three quarters. 'Running out of legs' for mine does not constitute as an excuse here.
2. This is merely hypothetical, but I think it is reasonable to suggest that there is no way we would have given up ~40 points in the last quarter if the game was level at three quarter time. Okay so they got tired, but 40-50 points after three quarters of domination? Hmmmm...
It was obvious that the players knew they had it won and just sat on there asses. I don't want to see sugar-coating of this. Our inability to finish teams off was a problem right throughout Laidly's tenure and, combined with our always terrible percentage, represents to me a near enough is good enough attitude. A premiership is all that is good enough in the final analysis, and you will never win a premiership by just gifting 40 points and entire quarters to teams. Yes we won and I truly am very pleased with how all of our guys played (except 1 or 2), but that last quarter was a far-cry from the 'competitive' North that the club has been spruiking - it was instead a capitulation reminiscent of the St.Kilda game in rnd 2.
Okay now I prepare for the negative nelly posts etc... Seriously I really enjoyed that match and how all our blokes played... just the team as a whole really fluffed that last quarter.


