Votes v Dockers

[Eagle Ant]

5) Embley- Was everywhere
4) Masten: Tackeling machine
3) Hurn: Played well
2) Rosa: Another good game
1) LeCras: Tried hard

HM: Lynch, Brown and Kennedy for the 2 hit hee hee

 

[Adam Selwood]

5-Glass
4-Houlihan
3-Masten
2-Embley
1-McGinnity

 

[sTeeL]

5- Embley
4- Brown
3- Masten
2- Hurn
1- Houlihan

 

[tesseract]

5-Embley
4-Masten
3-Houlihan
2-Rosa
1-Priddis

HM- Wirra, Bunga, Glass, Kennedy

 

[Crimson King]

5. Glass
4. Houlihan
3. Masten
2. Embley
1. Brown

 

[Eagle87]

5. Embley
4. Glass
3. Houlihan
2. Masten
1. Rosa

I am failing to see the point of 3 enormous/slow talls (at times) in our forward 50 with zero crumbing or quick players. This is made worse by the unwillingness of our team to get the ball in quick and try and exploit that height. We chip chip chip and then try a precise pass into traffic. Whats the point of all the talls if we dont try and use their height????????

 

[wce_all_da_way]

5. Embley
4. Glass
3. Houlihan
2. Masten
1. Rosa

Swap Glass and Embley and those are my votes.

 

[THE411]

Watched the game from inside the freo cheersquad behind the goals so didn't get the best view of it all but...

5. Houlihan
4. Embley
3. Glass
2. Masten
1. Rosa

 

[WCE57]

5. Glass
4. Masten
3. Houlihan
2. A.Selwood
1. Brown

 

[wirra44]

5. Glass
4. Houlihan
3. Masten
2. Embley
1. Naita( gave him votes because he makes the game more exciting and you dont know what he is going to do.)

 

[scooter22]

5-Embley
4-Houlihan
3-Ebert
2-masten
1-Glass

 

[Darkness Falls]

5.Embley
4.Houlihan
3.Masten
2.Glass
1.Rosa

 

[gx122]

5 Embley
4 Glass
3 Houli
2 Masten
1 Mcginnity

 

[mitchzz]

5. Embley
4. Glass
3. Masten
2. Houlihan
1. Kennedy

 

[larrikin]

5 - Embley
4 - Glass
3 - Masten
2 - Houlihan
1 - Rosa

 

[purple hater]

5. Embley
4. Glass
3. Houlihan
2. Masten
1. Rosa

I cant believe Embley was our BOG even after missing all those shots on goal.

 

[Genesis67]

5. Embley
4. Houlihan
3. Glass
2. Masten
1. Rosa

HM to Spangher, thought he did a good job shutting down Bradley for the most part.

 

[Frodo]

5. Glass
4. Embley
3. Priddis
2. Selwood A
1. Masten

 

[Eagle87]

5. Embley
4. Houlihan
3. Glass
2. Masten
1. Rosa

HM to Spangher, thought he did a good job shutting down Bradley for the most part.

Is that a desirable outcome though?

It seems to me the world is a better place - for the opposition - when Kepler is allowed to get the ball and butcher it mercilessly all over the shop!

 

[Genesis67]

LOLZ

While that is probably a very fair point E87, I would still have thought No Impact > Minimal Impact?

Either way, I thought Spangher was good yesterday.

 

[Belgarion]

5. Selwood
4. Masten
3. Embley (would have got 5 if he had kicked a goal when right in front in the last quarter)
2. Houlihan
1. Glass

 

[drexel]

5. Glass - as usual
4. Wirra - his sweeping would be so much more damaging in a good team. Who cares if he's loose.
3. Embley - usual
2. Masten - continued improvement
1. Rosa - broke lines at times when needed

 

[Lucev23]

Glass
Embley
Adam Selwood
Masten
Rosa

 

[Lucev23]

5. Glass
4. Houlihan
3. Masten
2. Embley
1. Naita( gave him votes because he makes the game more exciting and you dont know what he is going to do.)

Pretty bullshit reason for votes if you ask me.

 

[dynamite kid]

5 Embley
4 Glass
3 Masten
2 Houlihan
1 Hurn

HM Rosa, A Selwood.

DHM the team as whole for serving up a big steaming pile of poo for us to dine on. Masterchef would not be happy.