Votes Vs Cats

[NQTIGER]

3 Lids
2 Nahas
1 Tuck

mentions Rance, Conca

 

["The Roar Is Back"]

3 Lids
2 Nahas
1 Tuck

mentions Rance, Conca

NQT I'm not sure if your being srs with Lids and Conca ?

 

[Jisha]

I thought lids was pretty horrible with some of his decisions today, but looking at the stats he did alright

5. Rance - For what it is worth, he destroyed Pods today. Should definitely get a pat on the back.



4. Tuck
3. Nahas
2. Foley
1. Cotch

Edit: Cotch got 38 touches, Didn't expect that!

 

[thecotch]

Votes v Geelong

3. Cotch
2. Lids
1. Nahas

 

[TigerTime88]

Yeah Lids and Conca would be in my top 5.

 

[thecotch]

3 Lids
2 Nahas
1 Tuck

mentions Rance, Conca

Hmmm cotch has 38 disposals and 129 DT points and not one vote?

 

[TigerTime88]

5. Rance
4. Cotchin
3. Conca
2. Nahas
1. Deledio

 

[TheCuzEffect]

Cotchin 3
Rance 2
Deledio 1

Cotchin; 37 touches, 13 clearances and 5 tackles

 

[rideclutch]

3. Cotch - had 20 blokes hanging off him every time he got the ball, still played well.

2. Tuck - Lots of heart, all I ask.

1. Nahas - tried all day to create, 20 odd disposals and 2 goals.

 

[Jisha]

Hmmm cotch has 38 disposals and 129 DT points and not one vote?

He definitely probably deserves a vote, not sure if I can change mine now. He definitely tried, just didn't realise he got the ball THAT much

 

[harimal12]

Nahas
Rance
Conca

 

[NQTIGER]

NQT I'm not sure if your being srs with Lids and Conca ?

We all see the game differently, I was watching with development in mind....


Oh by the way i was wearing

 

[Hong Kong Phooey]

This is a team game and as soon as we start playing like a team,then lets look at individual votes.

 

["The Roar Is Back"]

I can not believe people are putting Conca anywhere near our best players , absolutely astonished , I'd love some insight on what he did in the first half which was to Richmonds advantage ?
He was terrible absolutely woeful early, and Edwards proved in the last parts of the game how much easier it is off half back !

 

[Jisha]

I can not believe people are putting Conca anywhere near our best players , absolutely astonished , I'd love some insight on what he did in the first half which was to Richmonds advantage ?
He was terrible absolutely woeful early, and Edwards proved in the last parts of the game how much easier it is off half back !

After the first 4 votes it got kind of tough. He was awful like 20 other players in the first half, but he definitely was trying hard in the second half.

Saying that, after thinking about it I have changed my last vote to Cotch, He did work very very hard.

Conca did however have a very good last quarter

 

[Bojangles17]

nahas, rance, foley, conca and tucky could be proud of their efforts , suprised to ehar cotch had that much of it, dont reckon he hurt opposition much

JR was better today ...50-60% of what he is capable of...an improvement on 25% in recent weeks

 

[Kyusss]

3 Cotch
2 Tuck
1 Rance

 

["The Roar Is Back"]

After the first 4 votes it got kind of tough. He was awful like 20 other players in the first half, but he definitely was trying hard in the second half.

Saying that, after thinking about it I have changed my last vote to Cotch, He did work very very hard.

Conca did however have a very good last quarter

Fair enough , sorry but 1 very good quarter doesn't outweigh 3 Stinkers in my view ?
Easy to be critical I suppose .

3 - Cotchin ( self explainatory )
2- Rance ( Beat or at least evenly matched his opponent all day )
1- Thursty ( everyones whipping boy , however done some very good things today, including some timely spoils , and very very few bad )


Tuck extremely unlucky !

 

[Jisha]

Fair enough , sorry but 1 very good quarter doesn't outweigh 3 Stinkers in my view ?

Oh it really does not, but for me in the first half the only votes I would have given out were Rance, Nahas and maybe Tuck. Everyone else made critical errors even with some people getting huge posessions. I am not saying Cotch wasn't a ball winner, but they all did make some really costly mistakes.

Unfortunately 1 quarter of decent football from Conca for me was better than 17 other players out there today

 

[austyn08]

Fair enough , sorry but 1 very good quarter doesn't outweigh 3 Stinkers in my view ?
Easy to be critical I suppose .

3 - Cotchin ( self explainatory )
2- Rance ( Beat or at least evenly matched his opponent all day )
1- Thursty ( everyones whipping boy , however done some very good things today, including some timely spoils , and very very few bad )


Tuck extremely unlucky !

Agreed, really thought Thursfield showed a bit. Still has some promise.

 

[Toothpick Vic]

3 Cotchin
2 Nahas
1 Rance

Would have nearly snuck Edwards in for a vote but yet again his atrocious disposal by foot lets him down.....

It is simply impossible for us to move forward as a side if we keep both McGuane and Thursty in the same side..

 

[RICHOLEGEND12]

3.tuck
2.cotchin
1.rance

 

[TigerTime88]

Fair enough , sorry but 1 very good quarter doesn't outweigh 3 Stinkers in my view ?
Easy to be critical I suppose .

3 - Cotchin ( self explainatory )
2- Rance ( Beat or at least evenly matched his opponent all day )
1- Thursty ( everyones whipping boy , however done some very good things today, including some timely spoils , and very very few bad )


Tuck extremely unlucky !

Not sure what game you watched....he was absolutely shocking. His decision making is on par with McGuanes.

 

[thetwooth]

3. rance
2. foley
1. tuck

unlucky cotch, its good he got lots of it but its what you do with it.

 

["The Roar Is Back"]

Not sure what game you watched....he was absolutely shocking. His decision making is on par with McGuanes.

Go back and have a good look at the game , and yes I read your comments on the main board thread !