Cousins did drop himHe is 4.5% under the team average for the year. Not great, but nothing to cop the crap he is getting. And if he is so bad then why hasnt he been dropped?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Cousins did drop himHe is 4.5% under the team average for the year. Not great, but nothing to cop the crap he is getting. And if he is so bad then why hasnt he been dropped?

When your disposal by foot is supposed to be your best attribute and you are ineffective with over 50% of your kicks then he does deserve to cop some crap for it.He is 4.5% under the team average for the year. Not great, but nothing to cop the crap he is getting. And if he is so bad then why hasnt he been dropped?
Hey Baazar, do you really think Connors disposal is as efficient as Cotchins ?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Statistically not that far apart. But no way am i implying he is near Cotch, just that Cotch needs to lift his game with his efficiency and Dan isnt as bad as people are making out.
Conners --- Cotchin
7.0 Kicks to advantage 5.8
2.3 Critical Errors 2.2
1.5 Kicks to opposition 1.5
2.4 Skill errors 2.1
8.2 Turnovers 7.2
Statistically not that far apart. But no way am i implying he is near Cotch, just that Cotch needs to lift his game with his efficiency and Dan isnt as bad as people are making out.
Conners --- Cotchin
7.0 Kicks to advantage 5.8
2.3 Critical Errors 2.2
1.5 Kicks to opposition 1.5
2.4 Skill errors 2.1
8.2 Turnovers 7.2
Most of Cotchins would be under pressure and Conners without pressure !!
Connors attacking efficiency is poor , whilst he has always been questionable defensively , and rightfully will struggle to maintain his spot within the side !
Well take Tuck, the player everyone reckons has the worst disposal
Tuck --- Cotchin
3.8 Kicks to advantage 3.6
1.6 Critical Errors 2.2
1.2 Kicks to opposition 1.5
1.9 Skill errors 2.1
8.6 Turnovers 7.2
Edit, made a mistake on Cotches kicks to advantage. 3.6 not 5.8
Haha... follow the threadSo is your point to again try and bag Cotch ?


One last thing, I don't understand the comparisons with Cotchin, Tuck and Connors. Cotchin and Tuck are in the contest which is why their disposal efficiency is lower than most others. Connors although ineffective today would have a higher efficiency rating (haven't checked though) than the other two. Terrible comparison.![]()
You are correct. I only used Cotch because he is such a quality player and probably will end up our best, but is ranked 38th for us this year in effective disposals.
50% of Cotch's possessions are contested so of course his Eff will be down, but when he has space he's one of if not the best in our team at hitting a target.
3-Cousins...literally on one leg and he still showed everyone up...
2- Morton - getting there...could've used his finishing as well though...
1- Connors - anyone questioning has NFI...
Hon: Martin....only one apart from Cuz who had any real presence...
Gourdis...good first 2 and a half quarters
O'Reilly did well all things considered
Post...good second half
and yes cheersquad kiddies King was generally good again...
Liked Astbuty's game...looked fairly composed under the circumstances...
Nason ....never stops...nothing wrong with his kicking or decisions...just needs to stick a tackle every now and then...
Worst:
Moore was towled up yet again ...outmarked and out positioned time and time again , yet gets praised by this board time and time again...for what?
Edwards is a dumb footballer....absolutely no awareness and a liability..I find it quite extraordinary people are giving him votes....stop judging on the exceptions to his game rather than the standard...
Deledio...not really "worst", but now that Relton is gone, maybe he should inherent the Scooby tag as in "WHERE THE **** ARE YOU?!?!?

