
- Sep 18, 2013
- 17,752
- 11,827
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Does anyone know? I was lead to believe Stonehenge.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Supercoach Round 10 SC Gameday Talk - SC Trades ,//, AFL Fantasy Round 10 AF Gameday Talk - AF Trades
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Skara Brae is alot older I thinkDoes anyone know? I was lead to believe Stonehenge.
If only there was some sort of search engine on the web where you could find out answers to straightforward questions.
You can't date when stone was cut, so this is far from a straightforward question.If only there was some sort of search engine on the web where you could find out answers to straightforward questions.
View attachment 232940
But you can date tools. The article itself balances the view withYou can't date when stone was cut, so this is far from a straightforward question.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ent-structure-Indonesia-20-000-years-old.html
Yes, there is conjecture with this site as well as the Bosnian pyramids the Egyptian pyramids Stonhenge and others. My point was more that it's not a question that can really be accurately answered at present.But you can date tools. The article itself balances the view with
However, Dr Hilman’s controversial findings are disputed and 34 Indonesian archaeologists and geologists have submitted a petition criticising the projects’ methods and motives.
They say that the excavation threatens the preservation of the site as it is and are annoyed at the prospect of involving civilian archaeologists in the excavation.
Volcanologist Sutikno Bronto believes that the structure isn’t a pyramid at all, but the neck of an old volcano and that the stones surveyed have been weathered by nature instead of being cut by humans.
Another anonymous expert is sceptical that such an ancient civilisation could have been advanced enough to build a pyramid so many thousands of years ago, when tools recovered from a nearby cave, dating to 7,000 BC were very primitive
To be honest the site does look like a tip.
"The fact is that building a pyramid is fairly easy, aside from the lifting. You just pile up stones in receding layers, placing one layer carefully upon another, and pretty soon you have a pyramid. You can't help it. In other words, it is not in the nature of a pyramid to fall down…"
Will Cuppy
Uluru
I'm keen to hear about that.
Can you provide me a link to that please?The pharaohs made the slaves build it during the dry season.
Can you provide me a link to that please?
Good book, thanks for that! There should be some useful information in thier.
However. Nothing on uluru in that. There's nothing in dreamtime stories either. Science also says otherwise.