
- Sep 18, 2013
- 17,752
- 11,827
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Thread starter
- #26
Still no answer to the OP?
a pretty dumb lot around here by the look of it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Supercoach Round 10 SC Gameday Talk - SC Trades ,//, AFL Fantasy Round 10 AF Gameday Talk - AF Trades
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Still no answer to the OP?
a pretty dumb lot around here by the look of it.
I'm putting my money behind Tania Hird's breasts in the absence of a better answer
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Well if you cant answer it then that makes you just as stupid as us.a pretty dumb lot around here by the look of it.
Those things they dug up recently at that place
The fact they don't really have a clue how old Stonehenge is, its hard to say. But I would have thought that'd be it. But Aboriginals been here for 40 to 60 thousand years , if they did build something that is still standing , well I don't know if I've heard of anything like that. They were nomads , but thats a big generalisation I have no idea.I'm gonna take a wild guess, and say whatever answer is given, you will say it's wrong, call racism, and state something about an Aboriginal structure being the oldest.
Be careful what you say about the Pyramids of Corio.He skims over the Geelong/Egypt connection.
After all, the derivation of Cairo from Corio is pretty obvious.
The fact they don't really have a clue how old Stonehenge is, its hard to say. But I would have thought that'd be it. But Aboriginals been here for 40 to 60 thousand years , if they did build something that is still standing , well I don't know if I've heard of anything like that. They were nomads , but thats a big generalisation I have no idea.
I'll go with Stonehenge.
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-15098959The fact they don't really have a clue how old Stonehenge is, its hard to say. But I would have thought that'd be it. But Aboriginals been here for 40 to 60 thousand years , if they did build something that is still standing , well I don't know if I've heard of anything like that. They were nomads , but thats a big generalisation I have no idea.
I'll go with Stonehenge.
Drugs came before prostitution.Id be more interested in the first use of mind expanding drugs - probably cam before the structures
"Hey guys, I dreamed something up, wanna find some big rocks?"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Göbekli_Tepe
Gobleki Tepe has been dated to approximately 9000 years old.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Göbekli_Tepe
Gobleki Tepe has been dated to approximately 9000 years old.
Sam Newman?Tania Hird's breasts.
Are you sure? Science has modern humans existing for 100k years... or more.Gobekli Tepe is 9000 years old yet mainstream science wants to tell us we were cavemen back then. Gobekli Tepe - and other sites - shows that mainstream science has a lot to learn.