Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
According to my science, you should have been phased out by natural selection too, but sometimes things don't happen as you expect.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement. -
Supercoach Round 10 SC Gameday Talk - SC Trades ,//, AFL Fantasy Round 10 AF Gameday Talk - AF Trades
Ancient What is the oldest man made structure on earth?
- Thread starter little graham
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Banned
- #77
Again with the cheap insults. Tool of the inferior mind.
Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
It was actually an explanation of why science can be wrong, using you as an example.
- Banned
- #79
As I said, cheap insults from an inferior mind.
The intelligent thing to do would be to attempt to rebut my evidence and prove me wrong, but you cannot because I am correct.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
I have rebutted your incorrect theories. You have claimed that science is pushing a narrative, I have disputed that with the facts. You have also claimed that science is incapable of changing and is rigid, I have also disputed that with facts like the Atomic Theory.
Basically, science is capable of changing, your mind is ignorant and not. I don't care if you see that as an insult, it's the truth of the matter. It is difficult to have an intelligent conversation with someone like yourself who is so blindly denying everything including empirical evidence. Are you Malcolm Roberts?
- Banned
- #81
In denying nothing. Science ignores the facts of gobekli tepe while I embrace them.
Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
You're denying science. It's obvious. I even posted the evidence and you've denied it like you built Gobekli Tepe yourself.
- Banned
- #83
Possibly I built it in a past life, I don't know. Science doesn't know either.
Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
Science knows that hunter gatherers built it
- Banned
- #85
Your science contradicts itself so regularly that only the brainwashed sheep could possibly defend it. Oh, sorry...
Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
- Banned
- #87
My science is the pursuit of truth and facts, not cherry picking them to fit a narrative nor confirmation bias affected reasoning.
Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
What is your science though? All you've described is denial based on it not agreeing with your principles. Not actual science.
- Banned
- #89
My science is the study of the past and the analysis of the present with a view to finding answers, regardless of whether they are the ones we want or not.
Knowledge is it's own goal. Ego and a determination to fit information to a pre conceived narrative doesn't qualify in my mind as science. If biased analysis is ok with you then good luck to you, the more reasoned and intelligent among us know better though.
Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
So, whatever you think is science, whatever anyone else says is not science. Got it.
- Banned
- #91
Like your science you're letting your pre conceived ideas about how you think things are bias your thinking.
Come to think of it you're perfect for modern science...
- Banned
- #92
None of the science zombies have added a single piece of evidence to this thread, and now they go silent. Like their science when faced with contradictory evidence their response is to ignore it and pretend it doesn't exist.
What a blissfully ignorant world it must be, the world of the science believer.
What a blissfully ignorant world it must be, the world of the science believer.
- Feb 24, 2013
- 45,365
- 37,747
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Man Utd Green Bay Melb Storm
- Banned
- #93
She blinded me with science.
Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
Or you know, we have lives and better things to do than defend something that doesn't need defending because one person is a nutter.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
There are fish traps in the Darling river - age is very uncertain - but some estimates say 30,000-40,000 years old.
Ok - they're not buildings, but the are man made structures.
http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/heritageapp/visit/viewattractiondetail.aspx?id=5051305
Ok - they're not buildings, but the are man made structures.
http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/heritageapp/visit/viewattractiondetail.aspx?id=5051305
- Banned
- #96
Still, no evidence. You're some scientist!
- Banned
- #97
Nope. Can't be true. Science says so.
Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
Science states that it can be true. Oh wait you're in constant denial because you don't agree.
- Banned
- #99
Haha. I love people like you, I really do. I see people like you all the time, and unfortunately occasionally I actually have to deal with them in person.
Let me put it simply for you, so your limited mind can understand: just because you think it is so, does not mean it is so.
Now do me a favour broseph and re-read that comment until it's no longer confusing, then get back to me.
Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
Maybe you should take your own advice.
