Ancient What is the oldest man made structure on earth?

Remove this Banner Ad

Bradesmaen said:
Are you sure? Science has modern humans existing for 100k years... or more.
Click to expand...

Not building structures though, according to ball loving science. Then Gobekli Tepe comes along and they pretty much just ignore it because it doesn't fit in with their (fictional) narrative of our history and continue going on about how we were just hunter gatherers then etc.

Your ball loving Starbucks science is a joke.
 
Duritz said:
Not building structures though, according to ball loving science. Then Gobekli Tepe comes along and they pretty much just ignore it because it doesn't fit in with their (fictional) narrative of our history and continue going on about how we were just hunter gatherers then etc.

Your ball loving Starbucks science is a joke.
Click to expand...
Someones had too much raspberry cordial.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Bradesmaen said:
Sure you are. It's science, nothing is fully known, an evolving process as you discover more.
Click to expand...

Yeah except your science categorically states that we were hunter gatherers only for thousands of years past that, and now when evidence like Gobekli Tepe comes along or weathering on the sphinx proving it has to be at least 10,000 years older than what they think your science just ignores it. Your science likes to stick its head in the sand when something disagrees with it.
 
Duritz said:
Yeah except your science categorically states that we were hunter gatherers only for thousands of years past that, and now when evidence like Gobekli Tepe comes along or weathering on the sphinx proving it has to be at least 10,000 years older than what they think your science just ignores it. Your science likes to stick its head in the sand when something disagrees with it.
Click to expand...
No, it doesn't. It clearly doesn't. And why is it my science? It's everyone's science, except for religious science deniers
 
Bradesmaen said:
No, it doesn't. It clearly doesn't. And why is it my science? It's everyone's science, except for religious science deniers
Click to expand...

Which bit "doesn't"? That your science (it's not my science) categorically states that we were primitive hunter gatherers 9000 years ago and couldn't have built structures or that the weathering on the sphinx proves it is at least 10,000 years older than your science claims? Because both are true.
 
Duritz said:
Which bit "doesn't"? That your science (it's not my science) categorically states that we were primitive hunter gatherers 9000 years ago and couldn't have built structures or that the weathering on the sphinx proves it is at least 10,000 years older than your science claims? Because both are true.
Click to expand...
What is your science then? L Ron Hubbard's?

Also, it doesn't state any of that, if you actually knew what you were talking about
 
Bradesmaen said:
What is your science then? L Ron Hubbard's?

Also, it doesn't state any of that, if you actually knew what you were talking about
Click to expand...

Lol, L.Ron Hubbard. Don't resort to common put downs, at least I am trying to have a factual discussion here.

Fact: your science is completely contradicted by Gobekli Tepe and so they ignore it.

Fact: hundreds and hundreds of geologists when questioned about the weathering on the sphinx agreed that it could only come from water. This is only possible if the sphinx was made at least 12,000 or so BC
 
Duritz said:
Lol, L.Ron Hubbard. Don't resort to common put downs, at least I am trying to have a factual discussion here.

Fact: your science is completely contradicted by Gobekli Tepe and so they ignore it.

Fact: hundreds and hundreds of geologists when questioned about the weathering on the sphinx agreed that it could only come from water. This is only possible if the sphinx was made at least 12,000 or so BC
Click to expand...
Fact: Science is an evolving process and much of it is never definitive.

Fact: you're way out of your depth with your tin foil hat.
 
Bradesmaen said:
Fact: Science is an evolving process and much of it is never definitive.
Click to expand...

So how has your science evolved with the news that Gobekli Tepe proves them wrong in everything they believe re our history? Not at all? Ok... not really evolving at all, is it...

Bradesmaen said:
Fact: you're way out of your depth with your tin foil hat.
Click to expand...

Actually I think I'm the only one with true depth here.
 
Duritz said:
So how has your science evolved with the news that Gobekli Tepe proves them wrong in everything they believe re our history? Not at all? Ok... not really evolving at all, is it...



Actually I think I'm the only one with true depth here.
Click to expand...
I'm not going to bother with a science denying man with a tin foil hat.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Bradesmaen said:
I'm not going to bother with a science denying man with a tin foil hat.
Click to expand...

Lol. It took me a while to reply to your post (about a day) because I was busy adding value to the world and was not able to spend my time stalking bigfooty.

It took you, however, about two minutes to reply to my post... And you reply by saying "I'm not going to reply."

Like your science there's such irony at play here.
 
FredLeDeux said:
Is it worth mentioning that the dating of Gobekli Tepe was done by "your science"?
Click to expand...

Not really, no. It doesn't matter how it was done. All that matters is the fraud that is science ignores the ramifications of it, just like it ignores the weathering on the sphinx evidence, and many other things because they don't fit its fraudulent "narrative".
 
Duritz said:
Not really, no. It doesn't matter how it was done. All that matters is the fraud that is science ignores the ramifications of it, just like it ignores the weathering on the sphinx evidence, and many other things because they don't fit its fraudulent "narrative".
Click to expand...
Where did you get the info on the weathering of the sphinx?
 
The Neolithic 1 (PPNA) period began roughly around 10,000 BC in the Levant. A temple area in southeastern Turkey at Göbekli Tepe dated around 9500 BC may be regarded as the beginning of the period. This site was developed by nomadic hunter-gatherer tribes, evidenced by the lack of permanent housing in the vicinity and may be the oldest known human-made place of worship.

But hey.. "our science" is fraudulent and pushes a narrative (what a giant load, someone who is either a god botherer, mentally unhinged or a scientist who got laughed away for having theories with no evidence)
 
Bradesmaen said:
The Neolithic 1 (PPNA) period began roughly around 10,000 BC in the Levant. A temple area in southeastern Turkey at Göbekli Tepe dated around 9500 BC may be regarded as the beginning of the period. This site was developed by nomadic hunter-gatherer tribes, evidenced by the lack of permanent housing in the vicinity and may be the oldest known human-made place of worship.

But hey.. "our science" is fraudulent and pushes a narrative (what a giant load, someone who is either a god botherer, mentally unhinged or a scientist who got laughed away for having theories with no evidence)
Click to expand...

According to your science gobekli tepe is impossible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SBD Gonzalez
The true cost of the British Raj?
Replies
7
Views
858
Johnny Bananas
Johnny Bananas

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top