- Joined
- Sep 9, 2004
- Posts
- 30,159
- Reaction score
- 32
- Location
- Where No Birds Fly
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Adelaide/Sturt/Wingfield
- Banned
- #1
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,11495629%5E2761,00.html
Roche claims discrimination over lack of halal meat
By TIM CLARKE
November 25, 2004
CONVICTED terrorist Jack Roche will have to wait until next year to argue a claim that prison authorities are discriminating against him by not serving enough halal meat.
English-born Roche, 50, became the first person to be convicted under Australian's new anti-terror laws after admitting to conspiring with terror groups Jemaah Islamiah and al-Qaeda to bomb the Israeli Embassy in Canberra.
After changing his plea to guilty midway through his trial in May this year, Roche was sentenced to nine years in prison, which he is currently serving as a segregated prisoner in Hakea jail, 27km south of Perth.
Roche, who converted to Islam in 1992, has lodged a complaint with the Equal Opportunity Commission alleging WA's Department of Justice is discriminating against him on religious grounds by denying him halal meat to eat.
During his sentencing hearing in June, lawyer Hylton Quail told the court Roche was essentially on a vegetarian diet, not out of choice, but because prison authorities had refused his dietary requests.
----------------------------------------------------
An interesting conundrum. What should our prisoners expect in the way of amenities and basic rights? I understand the old bread and water days are long gone..but with the amount of prisoners within our systems I feel we need to streamline the food needs within an appropriate budget. I have no concern with someone requesting a vegetarian diet as you just scrape the meat off the plate
But do we go to the extremes of Jack Roches claim? Should the authorities continue the vegetarian diet? Or do prisoners have more rights than that?
If a prisoner complained that there was no provision for a Vegan diet would the media jump aboard?
I just feel that with the numbers and I would expect differing races that the logistical exercise of trying to feed everyone a different diet would be cost prohibitive.
Roche claims discrimination over lack of halal meat
By TIM CLARKE
November 25, 2004
CONVICTED terrorist Jack Roche will have to wait until next year to argue a claim that prison authorities are discriminating against him by not serving enough halal meat.
English-born Roche, 50, became the first person to be convicted under Australian's new anti-terror laws after admitting to conspiring with terror groups Jemaah Islamiah and al-Qaeda to bomb the Israeli Embassy in Canberra.
After changing his plea to guilty midway through his trial in May this year, Roche was sentenced to nine years in prison, which he is currently serving as a segregated prisoner in Hakea jail, 27km south of Perth.
Roche, who converted to Islam in 1992, has lodged a complaint with the Equal Opportunity Commission alleging WA's Department of Justice is discriminating against him on religious grounds by denying him halal meat to eat.
During his sentencing hearing in June, lawyer Hylton Quail told the court Roche was essentially on a vegetarian diet, not out of choice, but because prison authorities had refused his dietary requests.
----------------------------------------------------
An interesting conundrum. What should our prisoners expect in the way of amenities and basic rights? I understand the old bread and water days are long gone..but with the amount of prisoners within our systems I feel we need to streamline the food needs within an appropriate budget. I have no concern with someone requesting a vegetarian diet as you just scrape the meat off the plate
But do we go to the extremes of Jack Roches claim? Should the authorities continue the vegetarian diet? Or do prisoners have more rights than that?
If a prisoner complained that there was no provision for a Vegan diet would the media jump aboard?
I just feel that with the numbers and I would expect differing races that the logistical exercise of trying to feed everyone a different diet would be cost prohibitive.





