- Sep 16, 2004
- 12,469
- 13
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Team van Berlo, Sturt
- Banned
- #1
Federer in tennis or the Aussies in cricket?
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Who dominates more?
- Thread starter fryingpan
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Banned
- #4
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Heisenberg_
17🏆19🏆20🏆
Australia, they dominate everywhere and everybody. Nadal is the clay court king
Whilst I'll admit that Matt Damon's rise has been impressive, he's still some way off before he conquers the Fed.
Australia. Fed needs to beat Nadal on clay a couple of times to establish total across the board domination against everyone on all surfaces. Clearly Nadal's inability to reach finals when not on clay reduces Fed's ability to rein in that head to head lead and the likelihood is most of their meetings will continue to be on Nadal's favourite surface.
Londoner86
Cancelled
- Banned
- #12
I voted for Matt Damon by mistake.
I thought it was Johnny Damon of the New York Yankees.
LH86
I thought it was Johnny Damon of the New York Yankees.
LH86
Federer. He hasn't won on clay yet but has been close. Basically clay to Federer is like Australia in India (although we have now won a series there). Federer is just so dominant. Australia is dominant but doesn't win emphatically. Federer didn't drop a set this Aussie Open. But you cana say that Australia has been on top for a decade. Pretty even. But I say Federer.
Kobayashi