Who would you rather out - Fev or Judd?

[mhill]

with the talk about Judd missing this weekend, it got me thinking who would you rather miss this weekend, Judd or Fev?

Both are very dangerous and Judd in particular has a great record against the Tiges.

Right now, I'd lean on Fev being a better "out".

 

[the ranger]

Neither. We are better than Carlton and need to prove it by beating them with both those players playing well.

 

[T4P]

we can win with them both in, but without fevola carlton have no forwardline, with judd out they have good replacements that can take his role

 

[T4P]

Neither. We are better than Carlton and need to prove it by beating them with both those players playing well.

but to truly beat them shouldnt they not play well?

 

[Wally Matera]

I'd rather Judd out everytime... regardless of the amount of possessions, he is the heartbeat of that side. Simply watch the last quaters of both their last two games... Judd single handedly got them over the line.

His last quarter against Port, was beyond belief.

 

[T4P]

I'd rather Judd out everytime... regardless of the amount of possessions, he is the heartbeat of that side. Simply watch the last quaters of both their last two games... Judd single handedly got them over the line.

His last quarter against Port, was beyond belief.

one player cant make a team...
without fevola the possessions judd gets would be kicked into an empty forwardline

 

[UpTheGuts]

I want both of them to get pantsed....

 

[the ranger]

but to truly beat them shouldnt they not play well?

Not too well

I mean, I don't want them to have the excuse that one or both was injured. If Judd has 25 possies and Fev kicks 4 and we beat them by 60 points, that would be great.

 

[Mr T]

i would have to say Fev because Judd is useless if he has no good forwards to deliver to

 

[Axel_41]

Notice if Fev doesn't fire, Carlton don't win...
Fev either has a blinder or doesn't get a sniff, whereas Judd is consistantly brilliant.
Take out Judd and the team is rubbish (look at WestCoast)

 

[Darth_Tiger]

Judd. but would be nice for both and we flog em

 

[telsor]

I'd rather kick their asses with their full list present so they have no excuses.



But if a choice must be made.

If Thursty is back to blanket Fev, then take Judd out. Without Thursty, I'd rather they lose Fev.

 

[Deledio2Conca]

Fev. Judd is terrible at the moment.

 

[kaipwn]

I'd rather kick their asses with their full list present so they have no excuses.



But if a choice must be made.

If Thursty is back to blanket Fev, then take Judd out. Without Thursty, I'd rather they lose Fev.

if Dustin had a decent game vs fev and he still kicked 7 its pretty unimaginable to think that 'thursty' can get the job done unless fev gets the job done for him and leaves his boots at home

 

[Wally Matera]

one player cant make a team...
without fevola the possessions judd gets would be kicked into an empty forwardline

Are you a ____ing idiot or something mate? The thread asked which one would l prefer to be out. I chose one player.

If l had have said Fevola, you could respond exactly the same way!

W anka

 

[turtle27]

For me, I'd say Judd. Without him in the middle, it'll never get to Fev.

 

[jko'neal]

Fev for me, he's the match winner for the Blues and they would struggle to win games without him. But as someone else mentioned our boys man for man are a better team, so they should win regardless of who's in or out.

 

[Benchwarmer77]

Fev...

 

[telsor]

if Dustin had a decent game vs fev and he still kicked 7 its pretty unimaginable to think that 'thursty' can get the job done unless fev gets the job done for him and leaves his boots at home

Let me rephrase...Fev will kick fewer on Thursty than he would on our other defenders...Even if that's 20 goals Vs 30, it means having our FB in will make a significant difference, thus affecting my choice of preferred out.