Remove this Banner Ad

Why wasn't Judd cited?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

S

Sailor

Team Captain
Feb 13, 2005
428
126
perth
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
South Fremantle, Man U
Can anyone explain why he didn't get cited for a head high tackle.
When I look back an Matty Carr's piddling report then Judd has to have gone.
What's in a name you ask???
What indeed?
Get the CCC involved because there's a stink of corruption already in the AFL tribunal.
Nothing changes.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

HAAHAHHAHAHAHAHA why wasn't HAHAHAHAHHAHAH HE HHAHAHA HAH H CITED HAHA!H!H!H!AHAHHAH!!!





Seriously though, you've got to be ****ing kidding me.
 
i would 100% say that if it had of been someone else from another team, they would have been cited. whether they got off or not is another question all together.
 
If you honestly think the Judd offence was capable of being cited/reported then you really are a galah who know nothing about footy!!

If you watch the vision, you can clearly see he starts from the chest area and it slips up. Free kick YAS a report NO.

If you are comparing the Judd and Pavich matters, Pavlish was a lot worse only because he made contact seconds after the person had marked the ball. Whilst Judd hit him CLEARLY trying to tackle.

The Pavlich matter was cleared and rightly so.

I am not a Docker supporter but I love footy and yes I agree you have been harshly treated by the Tribunal, especially with the Johnson matter and to some extend the Farmer decision, but doesn’t mean you need to pick the ***** out of other games to prove they are wrong.

I really think you should start watching footy for what it is and not analyse what happens to your team prepared to other team so much!!

Comments like this realy give me the *****s because you clearly have no friggin idea!
 
docker_johnno said:
cumon guys this is embaressing

the world is not against us i can assure you
Click to expand...

Agree with the first part. There's no way Judd should have been reported.

But I think Freo supporters have a right to feel aggrieved at how harshly we have been treated by the tribunal this year.
 
Quinzate1 said:
Man, Judd playing for Collingwood, what a nightmare.
Click to expand...

If Judd played for Collingwood he'd be considered the greatest human being to ever walk the face of the Earth.* The hype on their players is ridiculous. I mean, they actually consider Brodie Holland a top class AFL player.

*I know, I know, you eagles already think he is.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

nothing in it at all. And I don't think you guys are being treated any worse than you deserve to be. I wouldve thought if Pavlich had been suspended you would have something to whinge about, because he is a FAIR player, not a behind the ball SNIPER...the Johnson one was borderline, but they all knew the rules were changed, and it still is pretty gutless to hit someone front on who is over the ball...
 
Anyone who thinks the AFL doesn't have a say at the tribunal is kidding themselves.

The superstars of the game have always had a 'get-out-of-gaol-free-card' simply because they sell tickets to the games and create profit for the AFL. Judd will probably never have to go to the tribunal.
 
The reason he wasn't reported is because it wasn't reportable. Wouldn't have mattered who the player was. I hope that the people who start threads like these aren't the same ones who whinge about the game getting soft.
 
Sailor said:
Can anyone explain why he didn't get cited for a head high tackle.
When I look back an Matty Carr's piddling report then Judd has to have gone.
What's in a name you ask???
What indeed?
Get the CCC involved because there's a stink of corruption already in the AFL tribunal.
Nothing changes.
Click to expand...
You're joking aren't you? Seriously you're an embarrassment to us all. There was no way Judd should have been cited for that. And Matt Carr was lucky to only get a week - the two aren't even comparable - MC was in the air, with raised elbow and got the bloke in the side of the head. Have you seen either of the incidents? :rolleyes:
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

luvlicca said:
He didnt get cited cause his name is Chris Judd!! Enough said hey!!
Click to expand...

Dazman said:
Anyone who thinks the AFL doesn't have a say at the tribunal is kidding themselves.

The superstars of the game have always had a 'get-out-of-gaol-free-card' simply because they sell tickets to the games and create profit for the AFL. Judd will probably never have to go to the tribunal.
Click to expand...
Both Collingwood supporters eh? Who are you guys playing this week?
Judd has already been to the tribunal and got suspended before Dazman, but facts suck don't they?


And I'll tell you what, Steven Dodd was a little unlicky wasn't he?
 
Sailor said:
Can anyone explain why he didn't get cited for a head high tackle.
When I look back an Matty Carr's piddling report then Judd has to have gone.
What's in a name you ask???
What indeed?
Get the CCC involved because there's a stink of corruption already in the AFL tribunal.
Nothing changes.
Click to expand...

Apparently it was an illusion.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Why wasn't Judd cited?

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top