WAbulldog
Premiership Player
- Mar 19, 2022
- 4,030
- 7,905
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Vote headless
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Vote headless
I think I'm comfortable either way. Headless is the guaranteed one and saves us losing a potential good player, but also if the worst role we could lose is the seer, then its the exact same scenario as CA going down anyway.66 percent chance.
Think I like the headless play more tbh.
I also know you're essentially a mercenary in this game who would love to flip evil after taking out the seer hahaYou know my opinion of seers.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
True enough, though given CA has an impossible result on Gralin two nights ago and won't share his last night result I'm really not at all worried about taking out a villager.I also know you're essentially a mercenary in this game who would love to flip evil after taking out the seer haha
Will do! Just keep me alive!Vote headless
Yeah could have seered a wolf yesterday (hence joining the PM together) hence why not revealing the role of a player. If they are, I do suspect the other wolf is one who will resist the vote change (and have a feeling about who they are).To be fair, if he's our village seer, he's been very quiet until pushed yesterday afternoon
The last count I remember is from DP with thisWhat is the vote count? Didn't bother taking note as I figured we had a unanimous vote today.
Correction. Headless is on 8
Crim now 6
Fair, so possibly 8-6 with my change. Realistically need one more switch to draw, two more to flip. At worst it puts pressure on for some answers.The last count I remember is from DP with this
She then changed to Headless, so likely the current vote count is
Headless - 9
Crim - 5
But I'm basing that on info from others
I think #rolefluidity is the most valid hashtag for this game for people with 3 genuinely unsuccessful actions.
You’ve nailed the problem.I also know you're essentially a mercenary in this game who would love to flip evil after taking out the seer haha
We probably need to hear a better defence from Crimson AzureThe thing that swayed me in the end was so far for a seer we have:
Flog that was already revealed (died)
Player unsuccessful with no apparent reason
Protecting identification of a player who holds a good role
So the only actual role we found out is one that we already knew. In other words any one of us could have provided this information. Just need some answers.
There is a wolf PM now and CA (I assume) may have seered the beta and teamed up with them. This would be the one scenario where you or I were talking from a PM. It's much more likely that we are not.You’ve nailed the problem.
There are some people playing with some certainty of what their win con actually is.
Zerg could be speaking now from inside a PM (is that possible?). So could I for that matter. And if Zerg isn’t speaking from the inside of a PM, both of us and a fair number of others are speaking from a position of not fully knowing whether their win con might change overnight when they discover tomorrow that they are evil.
Headless lynched still allows for a village win right? The CA plan could create a resounding village win, but could also give evil a decent crack.
Correct, so for some reason I couldn't.But you were successful in attempting to seer JC on N1?
This makes sense. Crim is very clever, but no way do they have your experience on the right moves to make in a flash. Do you think this is what happened?There is a wolf PM now and CA (I assume) may have seered the beta and teamed up with them. This would be the one scenario where you or I were talking from a PM. It's much more likely that we are not.
Why is it impossible?True enough, though given CA has an impossible result on Gralin two nights ago and won't share his last night result I'm really not at all worried about taking out a villager.