Remove this Banner Ad

Resource www.footyjumpers.com

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mero
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The North uniforms were based on descriptions, which I've since found photos of on the Boyles site.
North long sleeves were striped down the arms, and the jumper was changed after the merge with West Melbourne.
For the first two years they wore Navy with White yoke, then alternated between Navy Blue and Blue & White stripes.
I recall the text described it as returning to the old North Melbourne jumpers.
I knew Father Gerard Dowling through the AFHG and either it was his book or a book he lent me.
I will re-do the 1911 jumpers, and try and find when they moved from lace-ups to long sleeves before the merger.
View attachment 2483309

I believe the earliest I can place it is the 1903 VFA Premiership team
Wow, I thought the Boyles site was dead! I had no idea they just renamed it. It wasn’t promoted too well. Thank you!
 
Wow, I thought the Boyles site was dead! I had no idea they just renamed it. It wasn’t promoted too well. Thank you!


THIS!

This is massive.


Thank you for the second hand showing of this.

I'd be interested in who bought the website or who renamed it and if it was done some time after Harley Boyles' death.
 
THIS!

This is massive.


Thank you for the second hand showing of this.

I'd be interested in who bought the website or who renamed it and if it was done some time after Harley Boyles' death.
Michael Riley and Ken Mansell ran the Boyles site, which died.
The images are from the State Library collection, which was donated by the Boyles family.
They were originally glass plate negatives.
The site added in known photos of clubs before Boyles career began.

I do not know who resurrected it, and called it Hidden Footy Histories.
One of the best resources in the history of any sport.
 
Something interesting in the above link.

The About Us page has this closer.

"In 2023 we renamed the site to hiddenfootyhistories.org to better reflect the widening content that we have added."
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

IMG_4153.jpeg
Carlton team of 1928. Some uniforms have monograms that aren't on any jumper on the site, and the most common one is not correctly represented on footyjumpers.com. Just some food for thought. From the Boyles site.
 
View attachment 2495541
Carlton team of 1928. Some uniforms have monograms that aren't on any jumper on the site, and the most common one is not correctly represented on footyjumpers.com. Just some food for thought. From the Boyles site.
I reckon a mix of the frilly-ness of the left F and then the Cs of the right would be the perfect mix Screenshot_20251213_171531_Samsung Internet.jpg
I was meaning to delve deeper into the history at some point but never got the chance.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

What if the stat data from AFL Tables and the footyjumpers graphics were all in the one place?
 
Last edited:
Slick looking site! Where do we find your graphics?
It's taken two years to get to this point.
The AFL offer an API to upload their data.
My son has developed the site to where it is.
Images will be merged in as we continue to work on it.
It will be stats.footyjumpers.com during this season.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Aren't the Brisbane Bears and Brisbane Lions officially 2 different clubs?
Depends who you ask. The AFL considers the Bears and Brisbane Lions as the continuation of the same club.

The Lions themselves have a different view, treating club and player stats separately. They restart the club match statistics from the 1997 season, treating the Bears, Fitzroy and the Brisbane Lions as separate entities. With player stats, anyone who played a game for any of the three counts that game towards their overall club tally.

It sounds complicated, and I guess it is, but it is the most equitable way to resolve the tension between the different sides of the merger.
 
Depends who you ask. The AFL considers the Bears and Brisbane Lions as the continuation of the same club.
In publications and on their website the AFL designate the Brisbane Lions as a separate club from the Bears with its stats starting from 1997. It should be more like the AFL Tables site where they're separate club stats since that's the official position from the AFL.
 
In publications and on their website the AFL designate the Brisbane Lions as a separate club from the Bears with its stats starting from 1997. It should be more like the AFL Tables site where they're separate club stats since that's the official position from the AFL.
I didn't realise that -- if that's the case it reflects a change from their original position, and a welcome one.
 
In publications and on their website the AFL designate the Brisbane Lions as a separate club from the Bears with its stats starting from 1997. It should be more like the AFL Tables site where they're separate club stats since that's the official position from the AFL.
Says who? The AFL Season Guide has always considered both Brisbane teams one and the same. To be fair my most recent version is 2024 but I've always seen it that way.
 
Says who? The AFL Season Guide has always considered both Brisbane teams one and the same. To be fair my most recent version is 2024 but I've always seen it that way.
This was always my understanding as well, hence leaving them in the Brisbane folder.
There was a banner at a game that summed it nicely, THIS IS A TAKEOVER NOT A MERGER.
I will speak with the AFL and get their official stance on the issue.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom