- Thread starter
- #76
or for that matter the Niall Ferguson and Hirsi Ali two headed connubial monster
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yup, that works every time....I cannot believe that some international intervention hasn't taken place to end this farcical situation. It's an absolute disgrace for those nations who have the resources to address this disgraceful situation to stand idly by while innocent people are murdered. F***k China and Russia, just go in and get rid of the maniac running the place.
Yup, that works every time....
Perhaps you've got a better idea, maybe you think he should be allowed to stay in power and carry on killing his own people?
Really! Conflating that my opposition to invasion as a tactic implies that I think Syria should be allowed to kill its own people is naive and simplistic.Perhaps you've got a better idea, maybe you think he should be allowed to stay in power and carry on killing his own people?
NATO vs. Syria
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/blog/nato-vs-syria/
By Philip Giraldi | December 19, 2011
Americans should be concerned about what is happening in Syria, if only because it threatens to become another undeclared war like Libya but much, much worse. Calls for regime change have come from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who several weeks ago predicted a civil war. That is indeed likely if the largely secular and nationalist regime of Bashar al-Assad falls, pitting Sunni against Shia against Alawite. <thats fomenting the intersect conflict>snip
NATO is already clandestinely engaged in the Syrian conflict, with Turkey taking the lead as U.S. proxy. Ankara’s foreign minister, Ahmet Davitoglu, has openly admitted that his country is prepared to invade as soon as there is agreement among the Western allies to do so <UN sec council, please please Ruskie and China recalcitrants!> . The intervention would be based on humanitarian principles <!!! lol>, to defend the civilian population based on the “responsibility to protect” doctrine that was invoked to justify Libya. Turkish sources suggest that intervention would start with creation of a buffer zone along the Turkish-Syrian border and then be expanded. Aleppo, Syria’s largest and most cosmopolitan city, would be the crown jewel targeted by liberation forces.
Unmarked NATO warplanes are arriving at Turkish military bases close to Iskenderum on the Syrian border, delivering weapons from the late Muammar Gaddafi’s arsenals as well as volunteers from the Libyan Transitional National Council who are experienced in pitting local volunteers against trained soldiers, a skill they acquired confronting Gaddafi’s army. Iskenderum is also the seat of the Free Syrian Army, the armed wing of the Syrian National Council. French and British special forces trainers are on the ground, assisting the Syrian rebels while the CIA and U.S. Spec Ops are providing communications equipment and intelligence to assist the rebel cause, enabling the fighters to avoid concentrations of Syrian soldiers.
CIA analysts are skeptical regarding the march to war. The frequently cited United Nations report that more than 3,500 civilians have been killed by Assad’s soldiers is based largely on rebel sources and is uncorroborated. The Agency has refused to sign off on the claims. Likewise, accounts of mass defections from the Syrian Army and pitched battles between deserters and loyal soldiers appear to be a fabrication, with few defections being confirmed independently. Syrian government claims that it is being assaulted by rebels who are armed, trained, and financed by foreign governments are more true than false.
In the United States, many friends of Israel are on the Assad regime-change bandwagon, believing that a weakened Syria, divided by civil war, will present no threat to Tel Aviv. But they should think again, as these developments have a way of turning on their head. The best organized and funded opposition political movement in Syria is the Muslim Brotherhood.
Mick, do you like the line about the Brit and French special forces training the Syrian terrorists?
So can we send that smug git William Hague to the Hague?
Thats some eponymous justice apples
or for that matter the Niall Ferguson and Hirsi Ali two headed connubial monster
Hirsi Ali is alright - she just wants to end female genital mutilation. You mad?
potentially, those french and english journalists may well be targets in homs, like i speculated before.
Well, the us found it no problems to take out numerous al jazeera, bad for the goose, still bad for the gander, but we r free to delve head first 2 hypocrisy.
http://www.theage.com.au/world/secr...e-of-leaders-inner-circle-20120315-1v5we.html
just repeat, rip to marie colvin. But not the only journo, and definitely not the only fatality. But i am calling "blackcat was right on this at the start".
mick ryan, u know when what is good for you :d listen to the master, ...please
سيد الحك[مة دائما دائما/size]
Hirsi Ali is alright - she just wants to end female genital mutilation. You mad?
Be honest brah. The only reason you don't like her is because she bags the Muslims. There are hundreds of more high profile conservatives you could've chosen to lampoon.dont support her using that to garner her place in the right wing echo chamber.
Be honest brah. The only reason you don't like her is because she bags the Muslims. There are hundreds of more high profile conservatives you could've chosen to lampoon.
I reckon the reason she joined a liberal-right think tank rather than a left one was not because she gives a s**t about markets or conservatism or anything like that but because there are no left-liberals willing to say anything derogatory about Islam.
Relevance?
[YOUTUBE]D0El9rN7Zoc[/YOUTUBE]
Depends on what ewe no, it's either baaaaad or or its?