manicmagpie
A slice of fried gold
Has anyone got a non paywall link to Robbo's article about Buckley from yesterday or the day before? I can't find it doing the usual google news search.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stick to speaking s**t, this laughable pretending you know anything crap does nothing for me.Stick to making up s**t, this laughable populist crap does nothing for me.
Has anyone got a non paywall link to Robbo's article about Buckley from yesterday or the day before? I can't find it doing the usual google news search.
It's posted earlier in this thread.
Continuing your theme, Milne's bounce and no replayI always find the "Buckley must make finals in 2016" argument a bit short-sighted. Question time: What's the difference between Malthouse being a master-coach that left Buckley a 'premiership' list versus a coach that could only a get a 20-2 team to the top echleon once? Answer: 3 points. If Ball doesn't kick that goal then the perception of Malthouse changes (and no doubt Buckley would have more leeway). This is why I dislike the "finals or fire" line of thinking as it's too simplistic. The key for me is improvement, does the 2016 Collingwood look like a better team than the 2015 Collingwood? I fully expect us to be in that group of team fighting for a spot in the 8 and am far from assured that we'll get there (from a quick glance there's about a 50-50 split on the main board as to whether we'll play finals or not next year. Seems about right). Subjective analysis seems to be a better guide for me than objective analysis. Case in point above -> the evaluation of Malthouse on the back of one kick. There are some things outside of the coach's control, "finals or fire" might not take that into account.
Don't know, is it?
gee markfs a very well balanced post nice to see
nah, love markfs's posts but this is not up to scratch. Undermines markfs's body of work. I'd much rather the irony.
Markman, are the voices inside your head echoing or in conversation?very nice presentation by bucks at the fan forum.... so we know now that every player is going to try really really hard. It's a good move by bucks and i think it might prove to be the difference in getting us to the finals...
Also i don't buy the inexperience excuse.
We have enough veteran players at all positions to help teach the younger players what a winning culture is.
Especially since the 2010 premiership wasn't that long ago and we still have 10 players from that team still at the club.
If only it was that simpleThis
Not thisThis
Markman, are the voices inside your head echoing or in conversation?
this
If only it was that simple
Yes agree.I do believe there are other reason's why we've fell down the ladder, inexperience isn't one of them however IMO.
Sooty to disagree but how can you ignore inexperience.I do believe there are other reason's why we've fell down the ladder, inexperience isn't one of them however IMO.
Sooty to disagree but how can you ignore inexperience.
Yep maybe a myriad of reasons fair callBrown, Pendlebury, Cloke, Sidebottom, Swan, Greenwood, Varcoe.
We've got a good enough core of experienced players and our young players are pulling their weight. I put it more to injury and the over exhausting nature of our game plan.
We have shed 2-3 experienced premiership players each season and yet still gone down the ladder on each occasion.
Experience surely is only but a small factor.
Only after 2012 took place was it evident that a mini-rebuild was necessary to have another tilt at the flag.
2013/2014 were really "nothing" years on field to be honest. They were more about list management.
2015 was the first year where we have had 80% of the list gaining experience and that will be expected to challenge for flags from 2017 - 2021.
There should be incremental and tangible improvement in the on field performances from 2016 onwards because this list will be substantially the same list that we expect to bring us a flag.