Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wasn't having a go about the typing, I added a bit to your post.Yeah, yeah, I never said that I could type
Wasn't having a go about the typing, I added a bit to your post.
His career was basically ended by injuries. They may be formulating an argument that the supplement program was the cause... But he can't prove his case if he doesn't know what he was given.
Well der...Elvis invented ASADA to discredit Essendon due to their refusal to keep quiet about the fake moon footage he produced.
The hearing started in Sydney on Monday, with the WADA team including Richard Young, who was also involved in the case against disgraced cyclist Lance Armstrong.
Asked outside the venue if he was confident of getting a result, Young told broadcasters "Yes."
"I'm not going to talk about the case except for the arbitrators, so thank you for your interest, though."
The first of Dank's experimentsWhat the hell was that thing lol
The only problem is that it can't be repeated as he doesn't know what the * he injected it with. Oh well.The first of Dank's experiments
Via a reliable 3rd party.
Port Adelaide CEO has said off the record that they are expecting CAS to hand down a guilty verdict with minimal player sanctions. This is to ensure the integrity of the whole anti-doping framework, and, takes into consideration what players have endured over the whole process.
As for Essendon officials, they may not be as fortunate.
Backdated penalties would seem to be pointless, no penalty at all really.Players appearing today may have been exploration around fault, no significant fault etc ? WADA certainly has a history re:backdating so no surprise if guilty players are available round 1
Not going to happen.Players appearing today may have been exploration around fault, no significant fault etc ? WADA certainly has a history re:backdating so no surprise if guilty players are available round 1
If any official from * can be proven to have known what was going on, I would not lose sleep if they were prevented from being involved in the sport ever again.Via a reliable 3rd party.
Port Adelaide CEO has said off the record that they are expecting CAS to hand down a guilty verdict with minimal player sanctions. This is to ensure the integrity of the whole anti-doping framework, and, takes into consideration what players have endured over the whole process.
As for Essendon officials, they may not be as fortunate.
I don't really buy into this. What have they endured?Via a reliable 3rd party.
Port Adelaide CEO has said off the record that they are expecting CAS to hand down a guilty verdict with minimal player sanctions. This is to ensure the integrity of the whole anti-doping framework, and, takes into consideration what players have endured over the whole process.
As for Essendon officials, they may not be as fortunate.
Players appearing today may have been exploration around fault, no significant fault etc ? WADA certainly has a history re:backdating so no surprise if guilty players are available round 1, 2018