- Aug 22, 2009
- 10,643
- 13,510
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Gutless turd.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Spot on!No mention of the fact that the PAFC gave up their rights to a share of the Football Park proceeds (value?), something we had every right to receive.
No mention of the fact that the PAFC gave up their rights to a share of the Football Park proceeds (value?), something we had every right to receive.
Fails to mention the SANFL has been making loads of dough off Port since day dot.... prickFails to mention the almost $50m the SANFL has gifted the crows in free rent too.
Fails to mention the SANFL has been making loads of dough off Port since day dot.... prick
Heaps good yea he's truly awesome like 1997Fails to mention anything that doesn't support his / the SANFL's agenda. Typical Souf Australianian media stitch up. Heaps good.
What about pre-1973 when the SNAFL purchased the land at West Lakes? Does anyone truly believe that the majority of those funds were generated by the Adelaide Football Club or the Glenelg Football Club?The contribution that the Port Adelaide Football Club made to the establishment of Football park between 1973 and 1990 is something that is often neglected by our critics. .......
David Penberthy you are just plain wrong...
The article on page 15 of today's Monopoly Times beggars belief and one wonders who it's author the self confessed 'know nothing about football' journalist David Penberthy got his information from. For starters Penberthy claims that 'the SANFL has lost all revenue that it had from catering at Footy Park with the AFL Clubs now enjoying that revenue.' We are left asking the question who is right because Penberthy's colleague Michelangelo Rucci has told us all that the AFL clubs get no revenue from catering.
Penberthy also makes the extraordinary claim that the sale of SANFL assets at West Lakes may not be enough to service the SANFL's current debt which Mr Penberthy puts at approximately $37M. Penberthy also claims that $16.25 of that debt is the cost of assisting a 'previously shambolic Port Adelaide'. At the same time Penberthy claims that the Crows training facility costs the SANFL $1.3M per year to maintain. If this the case one is tempted to ask why the SANFL covers costs for a club that no longer has any connection with it. One also has to ask how much money the SANFL has spent over the years maintaining training facilities for the Crows.
On Tuesday of this week The Monopoly Times reported that the SANFL was offering to pay off a $10m dollar debt to the AFL. On Thursday they are flat broke so we are all entitled to ask which is it ? There is no mention anywhere in this article of the reported $14M+ income stream that the AFL clubs will deliver to the SANFL from the 2014 season. There is no mention of the $10M the SANFL has reportedly borrowed from the AFL and what that money was used for. The SANFL is crying poor yet it can spend $420,000 on an audit to tell them what their accountants and executives should have been able to tell them. The PAFC is 'shambolic' yet an organisation that has to spend almost half a million to review of it's operations is just plain unlucky.
Penberthy rounds off the article with an attack on the AFL and alludes to some sort of conspiracy on the part of the AFL to take over footy. All I can say to that is if it is the case bring it on because the SANFL cannot do it. Poor old SANFL their problems are everyone else's fault. Poor old SANFL, last week Westpac ditched them yet this week they have had little difficulty convincing another Bank to take up their account.
I hope that the Port Adelaide Football Club asks for a retraction and a right of reply or at the very least takes to the air waves to correct the inaccuracies in this piece of pseudo fiction.
I am so angry about this article.
I think David is a little confused - he's got SANFL and Port the wrong way around.
Have you seen the new solar powered carpark lighting that the SNAFL had installed at West Lakes for patrons of the Checkside (formerly Crows) Tavern last year? They spent this money knowing that AFL football was moving to Adelaide Oval and that the land at West Lakes was going to be sold off. When you have a guaranteed revenue stream and no financial accountability like the SNAFL why wouldn't you put in new lighting that will be demolished in a few years...... Checkside Tavern? Please. The only time this did a roaring trade was game day. .......
One can only assume someone at the SANFL has some association to a solar lighting company.Have you seen the new solar powered carpark lighting that the SNAFL had installed at West Lakes for patrons of the Checkside (formerly Crows) Tavern last year? They spent this money knowing that AFL football was moving to Adelaide Oval and that the land at West Lakes was going to be sold off. When you have a guaranteed revenue stream and no financial accountability like the SNAFL why wouldn't you put in new lighting that will be demolished in a few years.
One can only assume someone at the SANFL has some association to a solar lighting company.
Lol... How can anyone take a guy with a monobrow seriously?
One almighty cockbiscuit.Who the faak is David Pemberthy anyway?
What about pre-1973 when the SNAFL purchased the land at West Lakes? Does anyone truly believe that the majority of those funds were generated by the Adelaide Football Club or the Glenelg Football Club?
One almighty cockbiscuit.
'Whats a football?' /Pemberthy..next 5-7 years.That said, an almighty cockbiscuit who'd going to be fun to have around while we're hoovering up premierships in the next 5-7 years.
One almighty cockbiscuit.
One almighty cockbiscuit.