Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Compare them to Sydney in 1985 during the clubs fourth year.The AFL must be getting nervous about GWS numbers, down over 2,000 on same time last year for a club that they are already tipping in over 60% of the income for.
The AFL must be getting nervous about GWS numbers, down over 2,000 on same time last year for a club that they are already tipping in over 60% of the income for.
The fact remains that GWS are 25% down on same time last year, what Sydney were doing in 1985 has absolutely nothing to do with it.Compare them to Sydney in 1985 during the clubs fourth year.
Or Brisbane to anywhere else, reallyIt's not too late for the AFL to move GWS to Canberra.
OK. What was Sydney's in 1985?Compare them to Sydney in 1985 during the clubs fourth year.
Or Brisbane to anywhere else, really
Time to Hammer out an updated graph I reckon.Updated membership graph - all teams included
OK. What was Sydney's in 1985?
1985 is ancient history.
Compare anyone's figures now to then.
They are more than 5 times higher now.
So, if GWS are 5 time what Swans were in 1985 they are on track?
Time to Hammer out an updated graph I reckon.
It's not too late for the AFL to move GWS to Canberra.
Move an expansion team with an untapped market of millions to an untapped market of 350,000. Genius.
GWS actually manages to get a decent crowd in Canberra. And by that logic, the AFL should have made another brisbane team, considering the entire brisbane population eclipses Gold Coast.
If Buddy went to GWS you could deduct 5K from Swans and add onto GWS.Maybe this is why GWS aren't getting much membership growth.
Don't have the final tally but Sydney have broken their membership record from last season.
http://www.sydneyswans.com.au/news/2015-03-21/swans-break-membership-record