Not sure who this guy is but he doesn’t have Edwards in his top 40.
Technically he does - Charlie Edwards is at 22. And to be fair he does say that after his first three tiers you could throw a blanket over it (although I would probably say the fuzziness starts after his tier one list).
I like the way Mitch Edwards marks the ball and also his athleticism is good for a 200cm+ player, but he hasn't exactly set the world on fire this year with his performances (he was only okay in the championships and arguably disappointing in reserves) and whilst his athleticism might be good it isn't in the top bracket for ruckmen this year (Compare to someone like Ethan Read, Archer Reid, or even to a local WA prospect like Zane Zakoletsky). The places for rucks on teams is fairly minimal and he hasn't done much to demonstrate he is anything other than a ruckman, only kicking 4 goals for the season in WAFL colts+reserves.No way he lasts to 40 the way he clunks them. Honestly NGA is such a waste of money and resources now you wonder why the club bothers with it. I’d be ok with us redirecting those funds to retaining key players.
That in itself I think may be enough to suggest he could go outside the Top 40.