Tye showed he can do it in his debut, and well boland hasnt showed it at all. I know who I'm picking but the selectors love a favourite
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How did we drop from 2 to 8 after one series?
He probably won't help that, he barely took a Shield wicket.Find a quote where I said explicitly Boland is the answer. Would prefer him at Vic, would be good to go B2B
Yeah we'll need to improve our bowling, but having Starc & Behrendorf would have been very handy.Selectors learning anything. Chances are this rabble will be off to the T20 World Cup.
Boland...Lewis...and good old Bryce McGain...ahhhh the Victorian greats.
Wow dude, of all the people in the world you chose a Richmond player for a comparison in a cricket thread, the Richmond obsession with North posters is outa control.He's basically Indian Jack Riewoldt.
Petulant little sook that has a bag of talent and cracks it when it doesn't go his way.
He thrives off being hated anyway so who cares?
What a game of cricket. Can't believe all the negativity here, well I can actually.
This is akin to Michael Bevan's matchwinning knock against the Windies in 1996 and celebrated in Australian folklore as one of cricket's greatest moments.
The fact India chased down 198 and hit 17 runs off the last over with a four off the last ball to seal it was amazing.
Calling the game insignificant is dismissing almost every non World Cup fixture, which you can easily convenience an argument for as well.
We might as well play no cricket and just play World Cups if that is your definition of a relevant game.
What a game of cricket. Can't believe all the negativity here, well I can actually.
This is akin to Michael Bevan's matchwinning knock against the Windies in 1996 and celebrated in Australian folklore as one of cricket's greatest moments.
The fact India chased down 198 and hit 17 runs off the last over with a four off the last ball to seal it was amazing.
Calling the game insignificant is dismissing almost every non World Cup fixture, which you can easily convenience an argument for as well.
We might as well play no cricket and just play World Cups if that is your definition of a relevant game.
Agree that it was a cracking game, easily the best of the eight short form games played. Australia might still be tinkering about with things, but it was still an amazing chase by India.What a game of cricket. Can't believe all the negativity here, well I can actually.
This is akin to Michael Bevan's matchwinning knock against the Windies in 1996 and celebrated in Australian folklore as one of cricket's greatest moments.
The fact India chased down 198 and hit 17 runs off the last over with a four off the last ball to seal it was amazing.
Calling the game insignificant is dismissing almost every non World Cup fixture, which you can easily convenience an argument for as well.
We might as well play no cricket and just play World Cups if that is your definition of a relevant game.
There's overreactions, then there's this.the bowling coach and selectors should be hung up by their nuts.
tim paine should be in this side
arrogant indian arseholes, hope their plane goes down on the way home
Would hate to know what he hopes happens to Warner, Maxwell and Faulkner's plane.There's overreactions, then there's this.
This series we basically kept our powder dry. The result means nothing. Not once did we play our best team or even close to it. India and everyone else learned nothing about us, while we learned a lot about the WC favourite. We are a very real chance to win the WC IMO.
Round it out with a bit of Shane Harwood, or Clint McKay or John Hastings if you're picking the Test team.
Problem is I don't think the selectors have any real idea exactly what our 'best' team is.This series we basically kept our powder dry. The result means nothing. Not once did we play our best team or even close to it. India and everyone else learned nothing about us, while we learned a lot about the WC favourite. We are a very real chance to win the WC IMO.
This; we weren't hiding our hand, we don't know what our hand is yet. And with less than two months to go, that doesn't bode well. On the other hand, T20, more than any other version of cricket, can turn on single performances, so if Smith or Finch or Warner get hold of one, we can still go a long way.Problem is I don't think the selectors have any real idea exactly what our 'best' team is.
Round it out with a bit of Shane Harwood, or Clint McKay or John Hastings if you're picking the Test team.
We know exactly what we have and chose not to play our hand a month out. We will be very hard to beat when the time comes.
Yes, but he conveniently left it until after the match to reveal his predictionDid the mentalist get the result right?