What I took from this article is that ASADA's case rests on whether Carlisle is fit for finals
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 11
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
What I took from this article is that ASADA's case rests on whether Carlisle is fit for finals
What I took from this article is that ASADA's case rests on whether Carlisle is fit for finals
dealwithit.gifI hope Ricky Dyson refused an interview.
I got lol'd at on the HTB for saying that Asada's case is weak with out player admissions
yes. Why offer a deal when you can just pin them to the wall. I don't get it. ASADA have always sought the most punitive outcome they can. We saw this with Saad.Further I would probably add, if Downes saw a possible case, his advice would be likely to proceed. And you have Benny Mc's line of Downes gave us the go ahead. Without knowing the details of his report/advice.
But the Essendon spin machine.yes. Why offer a deal when you can just pin them to the wall. I don't get it. ASADA have always sought the most punitive outcome they can. We saw this with Saad.
x 1,000.yes. Why offer a deal when you can just pin them to the wall. I don't get it. ASADA have always sought the most punitive outcome they can. We saw this with Saad.
the evidence would never be tested. I am certain of that. Tribunal bypassed, offer accepted, penalties accepted. In a sense it's pragmatic, if guilt is accepted why does it need to be prosecuted?But the Essendon spin machine.
I don't agree with that line. IF you are confident you go ahead.
I'm curious too how it would work if they took the deal. Would they ever have seen the evidence against them? Or would teh guilty plea be given to the ADVRP, who then put them on the RoF. (Do they have a choice there, I doubt it)
The way the NRL worked, seems that the tribunal wasn't really used either, just all agreed to a 6 month ban, no evidences tested, nor was whether they were complicit or deceived etc.
The Sharks saw evidence, but I wonder if the same road would have been followed with the AFL?
what a muppetFrom red sash- "The biggest bomb about to drop..."
Agree, and thats where I'd stand my ground as an Essendon player here. At least the Sharks players saw the evidence to make a decison. From there everything else was pretty much bypassed.the evidence would never be tested. I am certain of that. Tribunal bypassed, offer accepted, penalties accepted. In a sense it's pragmatic, if guilt is accepted why does it need to be prosecuted?
Or as someone from Blitz posted.Good chance nothing's going to happen, then.
just LOLed on the tram - damn you!!Or as someone from Blitz posted.
He's tweeting from the toilet again.
That and a certain 'bomb' that is about toe drop and make a splash landing.Talking s**t, I guess that works.
Or as someone from Blitz posted.
He's tweeting from the toilet again.
He's a naughty boy that one.From red sash- "The biggest bomb about to drop..."
lol, 2404 followers, I dont even...
I follow him for a bit of a laugh.They're all following for various reasons, some for a laugh. He isn't a bad person but his persona on twitter is ordinary at best. He is no messiah, however.
Deal making, yeah there's no downside, no 'history will record'...
Paul Gallen and all suspended Cronulla Sharks players banned by NRL from Dally M awards
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...m-dally-m-awards/story-fni3gol8-1227039764391
The NRL has banned Origin skipper Paul Gallen and all of the suspended Cronulla Sharks players from the Dally M awards.
Gallen was in line to win the representative players of the year before the NRL ruled he was ineligible.
The ban is expected to apply to the Brad Fittler Medal which Gallen was also favourite to win.
Fittler told The Sunday Telegraph last weekend Gallen should not get the award named in his honour.
“In my opinion, given the circumstances that he is suspended, he should be ineligible to win the medal,” he said.
And so it snowballs. The more things like this he is banned from, the more it will stick in people's memory that he admitted to a banned substance.