- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,605
- 53,047
- AFL Club
- GWS
Then why did he take it down when it was made public? Is he as scared of women as you are?
Managed an answer about whether you believe women want rape or invite rape?
-
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 14
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Round 13 Winner: Boyd oh Boyd
Cars & Transportation Feminism - over it
- Thread starter bunsen burner
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
Then why did he take it down when it was made public? Is he as scared of women as you are?
Managed an answer about whether you believe women want rape or invite rape?
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,605
- 53,047
- AFL Club
- GWS
Yep.
I thought satire was directed outwards aswell.
And it fits with how many of these mens righters see the issue of rape.
Anyone who thinks its satire needs to re-evaluate how they personally see the issue of rape and sexual assault.
- Banned
- #2,329
He does provide reason, but you're unlikely to find it from those who selectively quote mine. Not that feminists/purple poodles are looking for the truth of the matter.
I notice that KV doesn't provide links to each quote.
- Banned
- #2,331
As I've previously stated, when you go and back up your previous claims, then I'll answer your questions. In the meantime, I'm going to talk at you.
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,605
- 53,047
- AFL Club
- GWS
Rape is a crime. Well, at this stage.
Im not sure your description of borderline rape carries any legal weight.
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,605
- 53,047
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,605
- 53,047
- AFL Club
- GWS
The rape fantasy was replaced with this, after he shat himself and took it down.
http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/false-rape-culture/challenging-the-etiology-of-rape/
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,605
- 53,047
- AFL Club
- GWS
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,605
- 53,047
- AFL Club
- GWS
You need to learn that there sis nothing between rape and consent.
- Banned
- #2,339
'My "views are implicitly clear'"? Don't you mean Paul Elam's? The MHRM is not a hive mind. That's demonstrated in the variety of peoples that make up the MHRM.
If the MHRM were to dig its own grave, it wouldn't stem from anything you've posted. I'm glad you've posted the link. Now everyone is free to read Paul's reasoning for themselves.
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,605
- 53,047
- AFL Club
- GWS
Well he pulled down the rape fantasy...errr satire so Ive had to use a different source, but he has never disputed he said those words.
Men.
- Banned
- #2,344
He did say those words, and he sufficiently backed them up.
My suggestion to those who're inquisitive is to read the article.
There are many shades of grey in rape cases, unfortunately this is what make them so hard to adjudicate on.
- Banned
- #2,347
One problem is that consent can be said to not have been giving the day after the sex occurred, perhaps due to guilt or, because she doesn't want to be seen as a ****. So, it's not as simple an issue as you claim. Feminists want men to continually verbalize whether it's ok to do something during sex. This is unreasonable. No one does such. Sex can come about through non-verbal communication and actions in giving consent. Hence a lot of discussion wrt this topic in the MHRM, as well as within feminism.
- Banned
- #2,348
Meltdown Mario's posts on jury nullification on the SRP board immediately came to mind upon receiving the link to KV's AVFM article.
Have you got a link or thread? Haven't seen them
- Banned
- #2,350
No, I haven't a link. It's 1-2 years old, though.
I appreciate your link, for it wins this discussion on Paul Elam's stance wrt rape trials.
- Status
Similar threads
