Good call, bad call.

Remove this Banner Ad

Good call. The whole embattled thing works at collingwood, eddie only has to say something that everyone disagrees with and collingwood supporters lap it up. I think Carlton supporters are looking for more from him.

Henderson is our only player with trade currency - GC/BC
Bad call, the bloke in the number 13 jumper might have something to say about that

We will cause a major upset in the next two weeks by beating North or the Dockers. GC/BC
 
Good call. The whole embattled thing works at collingwood, eddie only has to say something that everyone disagrees with and collingwood supporters lap it up. I think Carlton supporters are looking for more from him.

Henderson is our only player with trade currency - GC/BC

Bad Call.

Yarran & Menzel both would definitely.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Sit on the fence for this one. Both are terrible and unacceptable losses. Our third quarter was beyond embarrassing, like getting an atomic wedgie from a 6 year old.
Terrible call. We played the Swans who belted Geelong by 100 points. It wasn't Germany turning the tables and trouncing Brazil by six goals at home.

Swans once belted us by 72 points at the SCG. That was the first of just two losses for the season. ;):drunk:

Norf game might be more demoralising, but they're in form after beating every top four team this year.
 
Terrible call. We played the Swans who belted Geelong by 100 points. It wasn't Germany trouncing Brazil by six goals at home.

Swans once belted us by 72 points at the SCG. That was the first of just two losses for the season. ;):drunk:

Norf game might be more demoralising, but they're in form after beating every top four team this year.
Playing the top team still is no excuse to getting outscored by 10 goals in a quarter. We were obviously capable of playing decent footy against them and the third quarter was just plain embarrassing for us no matter how you sugarcoat it.
 
Playing the top team still is no excuse to getting outscored by 10 goals in a quarter. We were obviously capable of playing decent footy against them and the third quarter was just plain embarrassing for us no matter how you sugarcoat it.
We let a rabble like St Kilda score 5 goals in a row. Not sure why it was surprising to anyone that a well oiled machine like Sydney kicked 10 in a row.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I can't work like this......

GC/BC?
bad call... you need to be more adaptable... hang on... you couldnt adapt in the first place thats why you are extinct now...

Watson and Casboult will make our forward line of the future?

GC/BC
 
bad call... you need to be more adaptable... hang on... you couldnt adapt in the first place thats why you are extinct now...

Watson and Casboult will make our forward line of the future?

GC/BC

WTF? call.

Casboult and Menzel are our forward line of the future. Not sure we have the other pieces of the puzzle yet.

This is the last season we will be mediocre for at least another decade.

GC/BC
 
Last edited:
Good call. The whole embattled thing works at collingwood, eddie only has to say something that everyone disagrees with and collingwood supporters lap it up. I think Carlton supporters are looking for more from him.

Henderson is our only player with trade currency - GC/BC

BC, as long as there is a Richmond, all our players have trade value.
 
GC. Here's how you do it call:

Malthouse should play Watson, Lucas and Garlett for the next 6 weeks in order to boost their trade value.

GC/BC?
GC...

Malthouse should also play Holman, give him a taste now even if not quite ready as he comes across as the type that would really work on his game over the pre season once he has been given an idea of the area's that need improving at the top level.

GC/BC ??
 
GC. Here's how you do it call:

Malthouse should play Watson, Lucas and Garlett for the next 6 weeks in order to boost their trade value.

GC/BC?
Both. Play them, if they play terribly it'll just give a fresher picture of how inadequate they could be for their new team. If they play well then we might be keeping them.
 
GC. Here's how you do it call:

Malthouse should play Watson, Lucas and Garlett for the next 6 weeks in order to boost their trade value.

GC/BC?

Bad Call.............for the idea and not for players being played.
We should be getting game time into those that are the future rather than those that may be the past.
What if these players put in poor performances? Value may actually head south.

Cripps, Buckley, Holman, Graham, Johnson and Sheehan to play the last few games straight, if fit?
GC/BC?
 
GC...

Malthouse should also play Holman, give him a taste now even if not quite ready as he comes across as the type that would really work on his game over the pre season once he has been given an idea of the area's that need improving at the top level.

GC/BC ??
GC

I have a suspicion he might be coming in this week somehow...

We should swing for the fences this offseason and cut anyone who remotely looks like not making it to target specific free agents & draft picks.

GC/BC
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top