- Feb 25, 2013
- 51,216
- 58,272
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
It's not even just the coach, it's the whole coaching stuff in general for mine
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not sure about our talent being superior.I think we need to look at the western bulldogs for a second. We can all agree that our list is far above them in terms of talent, yet they're playing like a top 8 team, and we're constantly embarrassing ourselves week in week out. It's just hard to not blame our coach, when clubs beneath us are playing above us, while we just continue to under perform.
What is most concerning is the downfall of quality players. Rich and Redden have truly gone backwards under Leppa.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Their weak what?Players can't hold their ground in a contest. Their weak.
What is most concerning is the downfall of quality players. Rich and Redden have truly gone backwards under Leppa.
They are not on there own. I am struggling to see any Lions players that are individually playing better than last year. The objective of coaches is to get the best and develop players, and I see a massive lack of progression with the development overall.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I might be being unfair but it is really hard to stick up for Leppa when we see what the Bulldogs have produced this season. They have a very young team as well and are kicking scores without genuine key forwards.
Not to mention the glut of top-end talent on their list. Like it or not, we need a bottom finish to get some talent from the top end of the draft.Didn't they say on the telecast that the dogs are 4th for fwd 50 entries but 16th for efficiency or marks i50 (something like that). Caliber of our forward line at the moment is well below WB.
When I look at our opponents now I look at their defence first. I have faith in our defenders although young and our midfield is strong on paper ( ) but I've struggled to see for a great portion of the season where our score is going to come from every week. With the forward set up we've got, presuming none of them will kick more than 2 goals on a regular basis, it asks for a mighty spread of goal kickers to win games. Bulldogs have a much more balanced list from end to end, albeit quite a young one.
I might be being unfair but it is really hard to stick up for Leppa when we see what the Bulldogs have produced this season. They have a very young team as well and are kicking scores without genuine key forwards.
I see small things that worry me about Leppa's plans. Why have McStay as a sub and play Staker all game? Staker has a few games of AFL left and we're hoping Dan will play for 10 years. And what on Earth has he done to Rich? Leppa seems so reluctant to play him in the middle. Happy to be corrected, but from the TV coverage on Sat night he didn't seem to attend too many stoppages / bounces even though we had Hanley and Beams pull out late. Rich needs to develop in to a 25 possession mid; Lord knows he has the skills to do so, but he needs the coach to support / drive that. Stop playing him across half back!
Unfortunately I have to agree with these posts. From the limited amounts of things that we know about, his decisions often seem quite strange to me. Leppa seems like a nice bloke and will obviously go down as a legendary player. Does anyone have the argument for why he should stay? (i.e. point to some positive things he has done or skills that he has)
Not to mention the glut of top-end talent on their list. Like it or not, we need a bottom finish to get some talent from the top end of the draft.
What is most concerning is the downfall of quality players. Rich and Redden have truly gone backwards under Leppa.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Looking at the Bulldogs' top young talent it really is a combination of top 10 picks (Bonts, Stringer, might throw Boyd in here despite not really contributing this year), father/son picks (Liberatore though again not contributing this year, Wallis, Hunter, and maybe a few others IIRC) and those from the same kind of age group as our GH5 coming into their own (Picken), supported by a couple of ageing stars in Murphy and Boyd. We barely have the first, especially if Aish leaves, we only have Clayton for the second, we were gutted on the third and our best older player is really Merrett who has been in and off the field the last few years. The Dogs have been lucky and good in nailing their draft picks but they've also gotten better picks and cheap talent fall into their lap. We're still trying to build out of a s**t sandwich here.Absolutely nailing your early picks is pretty handy.
Wet?Their weak what?
Looking at the Bulldogs' top young talent it really is a combination of top 10 picks (Bonts, Stringer, might throw Boyd in here despite not really contributing this year), father/son picks (Liberatore though again not contributing this year, Wallis, Hunter, and maybe a few others IIRC) and those from the same kind of age group as our GH5 coming into their own (Picken), supported by a couple of ageing stars in Murphy and Boyd. We barely have the first, especially if Aish leaves, we only have Clayton for the second, we were gutted on the third and our best older player is really Merrett who has been in and off the field the last few years. The Dogs have been lucky and good in nailing their draft picks but they've also gotten better picks and cheap talent fall into their lap. We're still trying to build out of a s**t sandwich here.
Nah just a straight up mistake. Thought he was only 26 or so as I was just taking into account how long he'd been in their firsts.Sorry to nitpick but Picken actually just turned 29. Surprised me how old he was. Maybe you confused him Dalhaus who was an amazing pickup in the rookie draft.
Looking at the Bulldogs' top young talent it really is a combination of top 10 picks (Bonts, Stringer, might throw Boyd in here despite not really contributing this year), father/son picks (Liberatore though again not contributing this year, Wallis, Hunter, and maybe a few others IIRC) and those from the same kind of age group as our GH5 coming into their own (Picken), supported by a couple of ageing stars in Murphy and Boyd. We barely have the first, especially if Aish leaves, we only have Clayton for the second, we were gutted on the third and our best older player is really Merrett who has been in and off the field the last few years. The Dogs have been lucky and good in nailing their draft picks but they've also gotten better picks and cheap talent fall into their lap. We're still trying to build out of a s**t sandwich here.
Weighing against that, they had a bit of a lost generation with their recruiting from four to seven years back (roughly) compared to ourselves, and haven't had the calibre of recruits we've had recently.
PattyKwasagun also talked up the individual abilities of their players, specifically their forwards, a couple of weeks ago, in what was an excellent post, but probably overstated the difference. They get a lot out of average forwards like Crameri and Dickson because they move the ball quickly and efficiently forward. We could get more out of our forwards if we did the same.
I think we're falling into a bit of a trap in overestimating the quality of their list precisely because they are well managed and Beveridge is adept at getting the most out of everyone, something Leppitsch seems to struggle with. 'Lucky' really isn't a word I would have applied to the Dogs at the start of the year after losing Griffen and Cooney and then Liberatore to injury. They have just done superbly well this season and their new coach deserves a lot of credit.
It'll drive us mad if we compare ourselves to the Bulldogs; they are setting the highest possible standard. But it should remind us that setbacks and list problems can be overcome or at least mitigated and we shouldn't totally excuse Leppitsch and the coaching staff for a disappointing season just because we've had some problems they couldn't control.
We've owned the rookie draft over the last 10 years or so M Boyd, Morris, Harbrow, Picken, Dahlhaus and Johannisen have all been upgraded off it and are guns, while Redpath, Campbell and Jong have been upgraded off it also, our older rookie guys have made up for a few draft howlers over the years. Quite a few of those players weren't junior standouts (except Dahlhaus who was primarily overlooked for his size), but had some elite athletic qualities Jong, Johannisen and Harbrow for example are all quick and explosive, while Johannisen, Dahlhaus and Harbrow are all agile too.Sorry to nitpick but Picken actually just turned 29. Surprised me how old he was. Maybe you confused him Dalhaus who was an amazing pickup in the rookie draft.
Yes, I'd agree with that, Beams and Christensen are much better standard older recruits than Crameri and Stevens for etc.Weighing against that, they had a bit of a lost generation with their recruiting from four to seven years back (roughly) compared to ourselves, and haven't had the calibre of recruits we've had recently.
Agreed on Crameri, he's been rubbish this year, yesterday was his 4th solid game for the year. 19 goals in 12 games isn't good enough a return with 7 of them yesterday. He's a flanker/3rd type at best, perhaps yesterday may have turned the corner for him but I'm skeptical still.They get a lot out of average forwards like Crameri and Dickson because they move the ball quickly and efficiently forward. We could get more out of our forwards if we did the same.
At the end of 2013 a few people thought we might win 10+ games in 2014, but it all went pear shaped obviously, the only positives from last year was losing 6 games by 13 points or less and winning the VFL premiership which quite a few AFL regulars this year contributed to.I think we're falling into a bit of a trap in overestimating the quality of their list precisely because they are well managed and Beveridge is adept at getting the most out of everyone, something Leppitsch seems to struggle with. 'Lucky' really isn't a word I would have applied to the Dogs at the start of the year after losing Griffen and Cooney and then Liberatore to injury. They have just done superbly well this season and their new coach deserves a lot of credit.
It'll drive us mad if we compare ourselves to the Bulldogs; they are setting the highest possible standard. But it should remind us that setbacks and list problems can be overcome or at least mitigated and we shouldn't totally excuse Leppitsch and the coaching staff for a disappointing season just because we've had some problems they couldn't control.