Found this in the Senate committee transcript for the Establishment of an AFL team in Tassie. All though we all knew it to be the case, it's good to have some raw numbers.
Surely the GFC should be reimbursed by the AFL for sending games to Etihad, considering we specifically ask for 9 Skilled and 2 MCG home games
Brian Cook said:...at Skilled Stadium when you have a capacity of 25,000, we make a net profit in that game of $638,000 per game, which is $26 per head. If we have a crowd of 85,500 at the MCG, which we did have against Collingwood in 2007, we brought home $771,000, which was $9 a head. Importantly, Telstra, now Etihad Stadium, with a near capacity of 46,000, we brought home $293,000, which is $6 a head. So when you compare a crowd at Skilled of 25,000 compared to Telstra, which is nearly twice as much at 46, you at Skilled bring home to the club $638,000 out of all revenue sources per game and only $293,000 from Telstra. It is extremely important that if an AFL stadium is developed in Tasmania, the lease arrangements and the revenue attraction arrangements provide a high yield to ensure sustainability. It is pretty simple, really.
Surely the GFC should be reimbursed by the AFL for sending games to Etihad, considering we specifically ask for 9 Skilled and 2 MCG home games