She voted out Baylor because she was the biggest immunity threat. She didn't want Missy and Baylor to be in the final 4 with immunity.
I hate the no competition argument too, the best players get rid of threats, there were plenty of decent strategists this season.
Did she say that during the episode? I missed it if she did. Is there anyone else who can have an opinion on Survivor without you jumping down their throat with "well actually no, this is why it happened" "this is what actually happened here" etc. Stuff me, it's like you are one of the camera men out there with all the things you think you know.
I think if Keith won immunity he would have gone to the end with Baylor and Missy. So wouldn't it make sense to keep Baylor if she was a threat in the last challenge?
I think Reed & Josh were the best strategists of this season. Jeremy knows the game but isn't half the player he thinks he is. Natalie got a brilliant hand and in the end deserved the win. Missy & Jon made a few decent moves but other than these people, I'm not sure about your call of this season being filled with plenty of good strategists.
But they would have voted Keith anyway if Baylor won immunity. It was unnecessary.
Lets be honest here, what threats did she eliminate other than Jon? most of the heavy lifting was done by Jon himself.
Exactly.