HoopsAhoy
Club Legend
- Sep 3, 2012
- 1,651
- 2,699
- AFL Club
- Geelong
September...but in which year?Chris Scott: "there are a lot of internal things that I won't divulge, but we think we'll be primed to produce our best football in September."
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
September...but in which year?Chris Scott: "there are a lot of internal things that I won't divulge, but we think we'll be primed to produce our best football in September."
problem is we have 9 guys 29 and over + cowan, vardy, menzel and simpson
that's likely going to be 12 players we need to turnover in a few years
Hunt at his best was pretty good and injuries really hurt him this year.
Next year maybe he ends up being best 27 and with injuries he gets a few games, shows some form and then either becomes handy depth or gets picked up for pick 40 instead of nothing.
What are we going to do at the end of next year? hold onto old guys, pickup list cloggers or use picks 80+ when we should be offloading 7+ players
buh? he had five sub 10 disposal games (one subbed, one final) out of fifteen games. how is that not regular? four of those sub 10 disposal games came in his last six matches. I'll cop the total clangers business but i guess if you're only getting 8 disposals you're not going to make many clangers kicks total.Bolded didn't happen. 3 sub-10 disposal games for the season, 1 clanger per game average.
But there's still no point in keeping him if they are not going to play him in the 1sts.
buh? he had five sub 10 disposal games (one subbed, one final) out of fifteen games. how is that not regular? four of those sub 10 disposal games came in his last six matches. I'll cop the total clangers business but i guess if you're only getting 8 disposals you're not going to make many clangers kicks total.
This is his season 2013: Taylor Hunt 2013 There is no re-writing needed. If you can't see his season degenerated badly into regular sub 10 disposal games then I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree on what 'regular' means.As I said, there's no point in keeping him if we're not going to play him, but it is neither necessary nor desirable to re-write history to justify the decision.
Varcoe, Hunt, Bundy all had some pace
Clark, Stanley, lot of height. Are we moving all our games to Etihad?
Not "out of the blocks", he isn't.Stanley is quicker than all those three.
Not in the reflex department, and Varcoe would have beaten him in that 09 GF sprint, no worries at all.Stanley is quicker than all those three.
You can't have a list of 46 world beaters.We've persisted for too long as it is..
Had many disagreements on here with the 'but we need pace' people about this guy's ability. He's simply not up to it, never has been.
Hunt's been given a load of opportunities too in various roles. He looks lost on the ground so they try a run with role, can't do that either.
Cut him and move on.
I've heard Josh Cowan has a lot of ability.They'll all be training the house down in a few months' too.
Exactly. Probably an 80% chance that whoever is picked up at pick 55/60 has a lower ceiling than Hunt, and at 18-years-old would be lucky to have half the capacity of him in the next year or two as well.I'm amazed at how often fans remark a player should stay or go without addressing the other side of the coin which is who replaces him.
In this case, pick 55 or 60 is speculative at best and I can't see how it can be expected to yield a better player than Hunt, as limited a player as he is. I would be happy if the marginal decision was Hunt or a pick up to 40. But beyond that it makes no sense to me.
Exactly. Probably an 80% chance that whoever is picked up at pick 55/60 has a lower ceiling than Hunt, and at 18-years-old would be lucky to have half the capacity of him in the next year or two as well.
I find it hard to believe a bloke who played 56 games in the seniors and 6 games in the reserves between the start of 2011 and the middle of this 2014 (in arguably better teams than we will have in 2015) is so far off the pace of best 22 next year.Taylor was pick 49 himself and he doesn’t have a role in our best 22 anymore. I expect there to be quite a bit of talent (possibly Wigg, Daniel, Anderson, etc.) left at our picks 47 and 55 this year.
I'm amazed at how often fans remark a player should stay or go without addressing the other side of the coin which is who replaces him.
In this case, pick 55 or 60 is speculative at best and I can't see how it can be expected to yield a better player than Hunt, as limited a player as he is. I would be happy if the marginal decision was Hunt or a pick up to 40. But beyond that it makes no sense to me.
He probably doesI've heard Josh Cowan has a lot of ability.
You can't have a list of 46 world beaters.
No, you have role players. The only role THunt was capable of was spectator.
His game against Murphy is one of the more overhyped performances on this board Daz, Murphy still had almost 30 touches and kicked goals himself... he went well the other way against him but didn't quieten him as a great tagging performance shouldAnd of course you had this criticism during the Carlton game where he kicked 3 and tagged Murphy. Or The Hawks game where he ran with Mitchell and helped quieten him. I looked in the game day threads and couldn't see his potting as useless then.
Go Catters