- Jun 15, 2005
- 69,233
- 60,483
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, Everton, Sturt
What is going on down there ??? Experienced, well regarded people in positions of importance........ What are we thinking
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's really not good business...I agree. On a purely commercial level, I genuinely don't understand why they so often s**t on the Crows and fall over themselves praising the Power.
The blokes won a flag in the recent era, he's more than welcome as a voice in our box...
Can't shake the image of woosh and Walsh holding hands now... Creepy stuff.
That was my first too.
I'm much happier knowing this is the reason he is in the box. I guess you get a little cynical and start jumping at shadows after a while.It flicked through my mind too (some may argue it hasn't got a lot to get through) but seriously, a coach is 110% occupied with the way players are doing their job and how the game is unfolding - Worsfold is there to see how effectively the assistant coaches perform and contribute in the box....for mine.
Maybe just a valued opinion from a mate.That was my first too.
Yep. Maybe. Think I've become cynical with all things AFL in recent months. It's the ASADA things worn me down I tells ya.Maybe just a valued opinion from a mate.
From what I understand it's to view the coaches and advise on how they are doing things, communicating via line coaches etc ...basically a coach of the coaching team. Phil is confident he can handle the on field stuff but what great experience and someone that is not directly involved with the team so a level head when observing the interactions of the coaches. Smart !!I wonder if Worsfold will provide any immediate feedback/ideas or is he there to just observe, positives and negatives and then provide the feedback/advice outside of the box.
To be fair to Sando, if I recall correctly, it wasn't so much they got the rugby guys in to fix the tackling, but they were in town to observe the club and its facilities, so they had them help out for a day and offer their advise on what was wrong with their techniques (not that it seemed to help much).I like that it's pre-emptive.
Not a knee jerk reaction to a few losses when panic starts setting in. Like getting a rugby bloke in for a session after Round 5 when you realise our players can't tackle.
New coach wanting to make sure he's doing it right, or still unsure about what he's doing? Undecided about whether this is a good thing or not.
Why's that?I'm not a fan of Luke Lowden but I seriously feel we dodged a bullet with Jonathan Giles.
Why's that?
Was it Chapman or Trigg who sat in on a game last season and reviewed Sando?Sign of good leadership to take advice from outside people. Outside people who know what they're doing.
You can just imagine them sitting there in the box like...Was it Chapman or Trigg who sat in on a game last season and reviewed Sando?
Remember one of them doing it and saying how great things were going and how full of confidence they were as a result.
I'm not a fan of Luke Lowden but I seriously feel we dodged a bullet with Jonathan Giles.
Horrible kicking action and bad shot for goal. Especially if we wanted him to be a forward first and ruckmen second and for an AFL ruckmen, he doesn't compete as effectually as he should in the ruck.
He strikes me as one of those guys where you'd take him as your lead ruckman if you have no other options, but you'd always be looking to replace him with someone better (like GWS did with Mumford).Horrible kicking action and bad shot for goal. Especially if we wanted him to be a forward first and ruckmen second and for an AFL ruckmen, he doesn't compete as effectually as he should in the ruck.
Woosha: well, now might be the best time to try mate. Then next game, we'll see if we can get him off while he's not asleep. Baby steps Sando, baby steps.Woosha: Are you going to bring paddy off?
Sando:why?
Woosha: Because he's unconscious.
Sando: You try telling Patrick Dangerfield he needs to come off.
I'm much happier knowing this is the reason he is in the box. I guess you get a little cynical and start jumping at shadows after a while.
Agreed , I watch a lot of footy in sydney and giles was one of the best set shots if not the best for the Giants. Agree that he lacks competitiveness in the ruck, he is too light and not dominant or athletic enough , you need to be one or the otherWell that's interesting, considering Giles is one of the best kicks for goal I've seen from a big man.