Society/Culture Violence in Society; Who is to blame?
- Thread starter wandering123
- Start date
- Tagged users None
cartwright
Brownlow Medallist
Lol, was that from the "lawyer"?
I wouldn't worry about it. I got the label too.....
no person who knows me would ever describe me as a man hater - its absurd. Imagine posting on a football forum and hating men.
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,593
- 52,996
- AFL Club
- GWS
Oh c'mon.
He thinks Obama represents the Devil, or something.
How can anyone be taken seriously after that?
- Banned
- #2,456
Yet people like you refer to Abbott as mad monk. Sorry same connections can be drawn.
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,593
- 52,996
- AFL Club
- GWS
Are you claiming that thinking Obama is a soldier of Satan and communicates Satan's message via hand gestures is the same level of craziness as calling Abbott a name?
Kynge of Begrem
Norm Smith Medallist
cartwright
Brownlow Medallist
^^ hahaha.
- Banned
- #2,460
Quote the post number of my supposed quote in the feminism thread on the GD board. Perhaps even link it. Don't expect me or others to merely take your word for my supposed quote.
Btw, you still haven't answered what my views are of rape? I'm still waiting. This is the fourth time I've asked. Therefore, my conclusion is your answer is not one that you want to share. Its pretty simple.
You've contradicted yourself in saying "I have not seen your answer. I do not believe you have answered that question. You dodge it, every single time just as you are doing right now", but have previously said you know my view on rape and that my view was victim blaming. This shows that you're dishonest and a liar. This dishonesty is so typical of feminists, for they're willing to sacrifice honesty and moral integrity in support of the sisterhood's cause.
If you have an actual quote of my view on rape, then you already have your answer - unless it was a joke based on an "I'm a feminist because..." placards that feminists held aloft that turned into memes, or other such feminist nonsense that was brought to light to be scoffed at.
Before I answer, define "rape"? Feminists have put their own ideological twist on it's meaning and use. Also, what does "it" specifically mean?
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,593
- 52,996
- AFL Club
- GWS
Floor Pie
Cancelled
- May 13, 2014
- 2,580
- 2,404
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
I don't understand... He says that he answered it before... But now he is saying he wont answer it until you define rape...Sex without consent.
p.s.
- Banned
- #2,463
"I don't understand" sums up your comprehension on this men's and women's human rights issues. You should've quoted Cartwright, for she claims knowledge of my views on rape, with it being claimed by her that it's victim blaming. She has as yet to provide evidence of such.
- Banned
- #2,464
Marxist Feminism’s Ruined Lives
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/mallorymillett/marxist-feminisms-ruined-lives/
“When women go wrong men go right after them.” – Mae West
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” - Winston Churchill wrote this over a century ago.
During my junior year in high school, the nuns asked about our plans for after we graduated. When I said I was going to attend State University, I noticed their disappointment. I asked my favorite nun, “Why?” She answered, “That means you’ll leave four years later a communist and an atheist!”
What a giggle we girls had over that. “How ridiculously unsophisticated these nuns are,” we thought. Then I went to the university and four years later walked out a communist and an atheist, just as my sister Katie had six years before me.
Sometime later, I was a young divorcee with a small child. At the urging of my sister, I relocated to NYC after spending years married to an American executive stationed in Southeast Asia. The marriage over, I was making a new life for my daughter and me. Katie said, “Come to New York. We’re making revolution! Some of us are starting the National Organization of Women and you can be part of it.”
I hadn’t seen her for years. Although she had tormented me when we were youngsters, those memories were faint after my Asian traumas and the break-up of my marriage. I foolishly mistook her for sanctuary in a storm. With so much time and distance between us, I had forgotten her emotional instability.
And so began my period as an unwitting witness to history. I stayed with Kate and her lovable Japanese husband, Fumio, in a dilapidated loft on The Bowery as she finished her first book, a PhD thesis for Columbia University, “Sexual Politics.”
It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was “to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’”: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/mallorymillett/marxist-feminisms-ruined-lives/
“When women go wrong men go right after them.” – Mae West
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy; its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.” - Winston Churchill wrote this over a century ago.
During my junior year in high school, the nuns asked about our plans for after we graduated. When I said I was going to attend State University, I noticed their disappointment. I asked my favorite nun, “Why?” She answered, “That means you’ll leave four years later a communist and an atheist!”
What a giggle we girls had over that. “How ridiculously unsophisticated these nuns are,” we thought. Then I went to the university and four years later walked out a communist and an atheist, just as my sister Katie had six years before me.
Sometime later, I was a young divorcee with a small child. At the urging of my sister, I relocated to NYC after spending years married to an American executive stationed in Southeast Asia. The marriage over, I was making a new life for my daughter and me. Katie said, “Come to New York. We’re making revolution! Some of us are starting the National Organization of Women and you can be part of it.”
I hadn’t seen her for years. Although she had tormented me when we were youngsters, those memories were faint after my Asian traumas and the break-up of my marriage. I foolishly mistook her for sanctuary in a storm. With so much time and distance between us, I had forgotten her emotional instability.
And so began my period as an unwitting witness to history. I stayed with Kate and her lovable Japanese husband, Fumio, in a dilapidated loft on The Bowery as she finished her first book, a PhD thesis for Columbia University, “Sexual Politics.”
It was 1969. Kate invited me to join her for a gathering at the home of her friend, Lila Karp. They called the assemblage a “consciousness-raising-group,” a typical communist exercise, something practiced in Maoist China. We gathered at a large table as the chairperson opened the meeting with a back-and-forth recitation, like a Litany, a type of prayer done in Catholic Church. But now it was Marxism, the Church of the Left, mimicking religious practice:
“Why are we here today?” she asked.
“To make revolution,” they answered.
“What kind of revolution?” she replied.
“The Cultural Revolution,” they chanted.
“And how do we make Cultural Revolution?” she demanded.
“By destroying the American family!” they answered.
“How do we destroy the family?” she came back.
“By destroying the American Patriarch,” they cried exuberantly.
“And how do we destroy the American Patriarch?” she replied.
“By taking away his power!”
“How do we do that?”
“By destroying monogamy!” they shouted.
“How can we destroy monogamy?”
Their answer left me dumbstruck, breathless, disbelieving my ears. Was I on planet earth? Who were these people?
“By promoting promiscuity, eroticism, prostitution and homosexuality!” they resounded.
They proceeded with a long discussion on how to advance these goals by establishing The National Organization of Women. It was clear they desired nothing less than the utter deconstruction of Western society. The upshot was that the only way to do this was “to invade every American institution. Every one must be permeated with ‘The Revolution’”: The media, the educational system, universities, high schools, K-12, school boards, etc.; then, the judiciary, the legislatures, the executive branches and even the library system.
Floor Pie
Cancelled
- May 13, 2014
- 2,580
- 2,404
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
Strange... you still haven't answered the question. That's not like you tessa.
First you said you answered the question already... then you ask for a definition... then you just avoid it all together and put up a wall of text.
Who are you, and what have you done with tessa?
Just kidding! That's what you always do.
Let me make it easier for you. Because I pity you.
Do you agree men and women both need to do more to decrease rape in society?
do you agree that a woman should be able to dress in a way that society dictates, and that ot isn't inviting rape? In fact, it shouldn't matter what someone wears, male or female, they are not inviting rape?
They are the victims, and the rapist is to blame.
Do you agree with that, tessa?
Hint: You should say you agree, and no "buts".
Floor Pie
Cancelled
- May 13, 2014
- 2,580
- 2,404
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
That was the biggest load of shit I've read all week!
Uni makes you a communist and an atheist... and ensures divorce...
- Sep 21, 2004
- 46,593
- 52,996
- AFL Club
- GWS
In all fairness, at our first intro session my Vice Chancellor encouraged us to become communist athiests. And something about smiting the believers down into the fiery embers of hell. Although I was too busy trying to pick up chicks to hear that last part. He was a curious looking fellow.
cartwright
Brownlow Medallist
Here you confirm how confusing sex is to you:
Your words: Feminists want men to continually verbalize whether it's ok to do something during sex. This is unreasonable. No one does such.
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/feminism-over-it.985637/page-94#post-33867753
You will also note this is where Kidd Vicious first asked you the question (July 4) : Do women want rape or invite it through behaviour?
http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/feminism-over-it.985637/page-95
Now, lets ask again for the billionth time. Do women want rape or invite it through behaviour?
Its not a hard question.
- Banned
- #2,470
Do you find it more concerning that there are more females who think women would have been the party responsible for alleged rape in certain scenarios?
Kynge of Begrem
Norm Smith Medallist
What are you talking about?
- Banned
- #2,472
In fact more women (5pc) than men (3pc) thought a woman was "totally responsible" for being raped if she was intoxicated.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-369262/Women-blame-raped.html#ixzz3CIhmuOA3
- Nov 24, 2008
- 7,063
- 15,106
- AFL Club
- Geelong
I can't speak for tesseract (nor would I want to) and as a man I can't speak on behalf of women, but I would say that is pretty obviously no - I don't think any woman would want to be raped, and I would say that if you don't want something, you are never going to invite it onto yourself.
That said, I do think that there are certain actions/behaviours that increase the risk or likelihood of being raped. Would you agree with that?
Kynge of Begrem
Norm Smith Medallist
If the telephone survey of 1000 people is indicitive, of course it is concerning.
