Paul007
Premiership Player
Hodge, Mitchell and Lake in no particular order.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They are both club champions. Thats why put Buddy in there.
But the question was who are the top 3 hawks during the 08,13,14&15?
Crawf was only there for 08, Buddy was only there for 08&13.
Roughy has been all of the them. Burgoyne in 3 of them (and absolutely influential in the finals of each of them).
People discount Mitchell over Hodge as Hodge has 2 norms to 0. If Mitchell had won 14 and 15 (definitely possible) and Dew/Ellis has won 08 (also possible) I wonder if that would change the perception of Mitchell in big games....
It is worth giving thought to - in 2013 we won while preparing for life after Buddy by having him play a bit-part in the side. It improved us to be less focused on him with our forward entries. We improved further after he left. He is an amazing player, but you have to look at the overall value to the team. In 2008 his overall value to the team was immense. Just towering, unmatched. The 2013/14/15 model is a different beast, however, and Franklin was less valuable to it. The money he would have cost us had he taken our offer would have gotten a much worse return than it has with him not taking the offer.
Any case, clearly it didn't cost us anything, losing him, as you couldn't ask for better results in the last two years than what this side produced. Given all that, I don't think you could make a plausible case for including him on a list like this. If it was 'The 3 Most Freakishly Talented Hawks of 2008 - 2015' it would be a different story.
he was freakishly talented but he also had a lot of flaws and yes we are a much better team now without him.
i would argue that we are still burdened by not getting any decent compo for buddy as a couple of top tier draft picks may have really helped us in the "transition years".
Mitchell has stood up in more finals than Hodge ten fold, also Mitchell was one of the best on the ground in 2012 GF not sure how you can call a 21 disposal 10 clearances game as a bad.O'Keefe also beat him in 2012. In the big games, up until last year, he hasn't performed.
.
1. Mitchell
2. Hodge
3. Franklin
Third was the hardest but I think he was the biggest factor from moving this team in 2006 to a genuine premiership contender in 2008.
Note: I've only counted players as part of the top 3. Off field is a whole different scenario
Yep it became quite clear that the offer that HFC made to retain Buddy was based on his value to the team not his value on the open market.It is worth giving thought to - in 2013 we won while preparing for life after Buddy by having him play a bit-part in the side. It improved us to be less focused on him with our forward entries. We improved further after he left. He is an amazing player, but you have to look at the overall value to the team. In 2008 his overall value to the team was immense. Just towering, unmatched. The 2013/14/15 model is a different beast, however, and Franklin was less valuable to it. The money he would have cost us had he taken our offer would have gotten a much worse return than it has with him not taking the offer.
Any case, clearly it didn't cost us anything, losing him, as you couldn't ask for better results in the last two years than what this side produced. Given all that, I don't think you could make a plausible case for including him on a list like this. If it was 'The 3 Most Freakishly Talented Hawks of 2008 - 2015' it would be a different story.
Roughead any day of the week for me. Far more versatile and that is a massive reason we have just won 3 flags. With Buddy we were too one dimensional and Buddy was no good anywhere but the forward 50. if that wasn't working having him in the side was actually a liability. Roughy has quiet games (according to our learned friend in the meedja) where he gathers 25 disposals, 5 inside 50s, 6 or so score involvements and 4 clearances. He fits that seamlessly into our midfield and half back line that people don't even notice how much of the ball he has racked up. Franklin could never do that. Franklin is one of the rarest talents to play the game, a freak, a crowd pleaser and capable of tearing a game apart on occasion. This is a team sport and Roughy fits that mold so much better than Franklin.Buddy deserves to be in top 3
Leading goal kicker
2 Coleman medals
I'd have Buddy ahead of Roughead
Roughead any day of the week for me. Far more versatile and that is a massive reason we have just won 3 flags. With Buddy we were too one dimensional and Buddy was no good anywhere but the forward 50. if that wasn't working having him in the side was actually a liability. Roughy has quiet games (according to our learned friend in the meedja) where he gathers 25 disposals, 5 inside 50s, 6 or so score involvements and 4 clearances. He fits that seamlessly into our midfield and half back line that people don't even notice how much of the ball he has racked up. Franklin could never do that. Franklin is one of the rarest talents to play the game, a freak, a crowd pleaser and capable of tearing a game apart on occasion. This is a team sport and Roughy fits that mold so much better than Franklin.
That is the truth? I rated Roughy higher than Franklin prior to 2013. Franklin was never the team player Roughy is and has always been. Franklins versatility was limited to very short runs through the middle where he would more often than not get in the way of the other midfielders. He had no positioning and football nous when it came to being anywhere other than 0 - 70m from goal. Roughead can play as a genuine key forward, high half forward, ruck, rover, wing, key back and bottle wash. Franklin could play as a key forward, high half forward or wing at a stretch. Roughy is, and was with Franklin in the team, the forward general. He is the one that marshals the troops and sets positions when he is in the F50. Roughead is also 10x the leader Franklin could ever dream to be. These are all reasons I chose Rough over Franklin. I think he is well ahead in all the areas you mentioned..........
I think you're massively underselling Franklin's versatility and team play here to be honest. Roughead is an all time great player, but statistically Franklin beats him in nearly every margin despite Roughead playing more out of the forward line. The only reason Hawks fans started to rate Roughead higher is because Franklin left and everyone knew it in 2013, that is the truth.
Buddy, Hodge and Gibson if I had to go with a forward, mid/utility and back. Obviously splitting hairs with some great players. Sometimes I wonder how different things would be if Buddy hadn't kicked that game winner against Adelaide in 07, that felt like the start of this era to me.
I think you're massively underselling Franklin's versatility and team play here to be honest. Roughead is an all time great player, but statistically Franklin beats him in nearly every margin despite Roughead playing more out of the forward line. The only reason Hawks fans started to rate Roughead higher is because Franklin left and everyone knew it in 2013, that is the truth.
Buddy deserves to be in top 3
Leading goal kicker
2 Coleman medals
I'd have Buddy ahead of Roughead
Rough also gets ahead with loyalty points. no point having a team with low loyalty, wouldn't get far.Your "Carlton style" thinking is why your club is down the bottom, and we're up the top. Buddy only has 2 Premiership Medallions, Rouh has 4, and he has 1 Coleman as well.
He has polled norm smith votes in all four of our premierships including taking home the medal twice. His leadership and ability to impact big moments in finals is incredible. For me the clear number 1. Mitch is mr consistent and clearly an incredible player and despite two quiet grand finals he is a big part of the reason we are a great side so he is my number 2. Number 3 is super tough. Rioli, Burgoyne, roughy, Lewis, birchall, Gunston, and smith all major factors. I am going to go for smith as I think it is his run that transformed us from a slightly dour team in 2011 to a more dynamic attacking team in 2012. His finals record is very very good and always seems to bob up for a big goal in the grand final.The reason I have no doubt about Hodgey is his performance in 2008 was superb, and the goals he kicked in 2014 and 2015 flattened the opposition and set up the easy win. The goal this year from the boundary was amazing, and opposition players' jaws just dropped. The intercepted goal in the 2nd quarter in 2015 from the kick in nailed it shut. He just did freakish things at vital moments and that's why I said Hodge, no doubt.