Conspiracy Theory Proof 9/11 was an Inside Job?

[Kellythatsit]

I will single out every one of the OSers for extended derision when the official story ultimately ends up being exposed. It is always being shown up over the years already (enough for any logical person to back away from believing it), and will continue to be exposed, but one day when it is clear cut...in meantime click the second last asterisk in my signature.

LOL!! I won't be holding my breath.

 

[exe ex machina]

I wouldn't recommend that either.

But, already there's enough evidence to suggest the OS is a lie. If on the day itself it was a massive leap in the dark to disbelieve the OS, today it's by far more reasonable to disbelieve the OS...due to the 'light of day' of evidence, info, etc. It will only keep heading this way thru the passage of time, not the other way. The jig is up.

 

[Daytripper]

I wouldn't recommend that either.

But, already there's enough evidence to suggest the OS is a lie. If on the day itself it was a massive leap in the dark to disbelieve the OS, today it's by far more reasonable to disbelieve the OS...due to the 'light of day' of evidence, info, etc.

Disclaimer: Drugs help you be more reasonable.

 

[exe ex machina]

disclaim yourself. you the 'day tripper'

 

[Coledinho]

How about logic?

Why would they blow up a building when the ones next door have been hit by planes?

Crony 1: Listen, we know that two hijacked planes are going to hit the twin towers. And that another one is scheduled to be flown into the Pentagon. However, we need to do more as its obvious that this isn't enough to inspire panic.

Crony 2: I know, lets blow up one of those smaller buildings next door to the twin towers. That will be sure to get some publicity then.

Crony 1: Brilliant. However, aren't we running a risk of being discovered? Surely the risk v reward ratio is way out of whack.

Crony 2: Nobody will notice.

Crony 1: But we will need tons of explosives, operatives to plant them, engineers to plan (we need it to land in its own footprint okay - don't ask me why, its not important), transport etc. And the building is in one of the most populated places on earth.

Crony 2: Everyone will be paid off and we will do all the work at night.

Crony 1: For 6 months?

Crony 2: Yes, easy done.

Crony 1: And just one more thing What if the planes miss the twin towers or the hijacking fails? Won't it look a bit silly if we are forced to just blow up a building for no reason at all?

Crony 2: We'll just blame terrorists.

Crony 1: But logistically its not possiblt to blow up a building that size in one act. It need months and months of work.

Crony 2: You worry too much. We've got people on the inside in the media. It will be right.

Crony 1: Okay then. lets do it.

A very simple thought process into something well lets be honest isnt. Much more likely they blew the building up in order to cover tracks/hide evidence as it would be that it fell down because it was on fire and also quite possibly due to Popular Mechanics theory one of the most poorly constructed building in this generation

I guess the theory has been proven. The theory that Earthquakes dont cause buildings to collapse. Fire does

 

[Daytripper]

A very simple thought process into something well lets be honest isnt. Much more likely they blew the building up in order to cover tracks/hide evidence as it would be that it fell down because it was on fire and also quite possibly due to Popular Mechanics theory one of the most poorly constructed building in this generation

Hide evidence of what?

 

[Coledinho]

Hide evidence of what?

That they also brought down the twin towers. Unless you think a skyscraper of that calibre can fall at that velocity due to bent (not melted) metal as the government and others claim.

Like Ventura claims he believes the government knew what was happening (govt documents indicate they knew details as early as August 6th) and just dramatised the event. Do you really think a war would of started if planes flew into buildings and they started on fire and that was it? I doubt it would of

Regardless questions are being dodged. How did those three buildings collapse that quickly due to fire?

 

[Kellythatsit]

I wouldn't recommend that either.

But, already there's enough evidence to suggest the OS is a lie. If on the day itself it was a massive leap in the dark to disbelieve the OS, today it's by far more reasonable to disbelieve the OS...due to the 'light of day' of evidence, info, etc. It will only keep heading this way thru the passage of time, not the other way. The jig is up.

Is this the same kind of evidence that shows Woody Harrelson's dad in Dealy Plaza, Buddy Holly was a CIA operative and that Brushy Bill Roberts was your avatar?

People keep spouting on about the lies of the OS but are reluctant to clarify what these lies are? Where has the OS mislead us and what evidence proves this?

I asked this question about 6 months ago and as yet no one has provided a suitable explanation.

 

[vealesy]

What happened to the plane that hit wtc7?

Oh wai...

 

[Kellythatsit]

That they also brought down the twin towers. Unless you think a skyscraper of that calibre can fall at that velocity due to bent (not melted) metal as the government and others claim.

Like Ventura claims he believes the government knew what was happening (govt documents indicate they knew details as early as August 6th) and just dramatised the event. Do you really think a war would of started if planes flew into buildings and they started on fire and that was it? I doubt it would of

Regardless questions are being dodged. How did those three buildings collapse that quickly due to fire?

Oh yes that document has been raised already on this thread.

You dismiss the reams of evidence (as well as common sense) proving the contrary, yet cling to a vague memo as proof positive of Government complicity.

Laughable

 

[Kellythatsit]

How about logic?

Why would they blow up a building when the ones next door have been hit by planes?

Crony 1: Listen, we know that two hijacked planes are going to hit the twin towers. And that another one is scheduled to be flown into the Pentagon. However, we need to do more as its obvious that this isn't enough to inspire panic.

Crony 2: I know, lets blow up one of those smaller buildings next door to the twin towers. That will be sure to get some publicity then.

Crony 1: Brilliant. However, aren't we running a risk of being discovered? Surely the risk v reward ratio is way out of whack.

Crony 2: Nobody will notice.

Crony 1: But we will need tons of explosives, operatives to plant them, engineers to plan (we need it to land in its own footprint okay - don't ask me why, its not important), transport etc. And the building is in one of the most populated places on earth.

Crony 2: Everyone will be paid off and we will do all the work at night.

Crony 1: For 6 months?

Crony 2: Yes, easy done.

Crony 1: And just one more thing What if the planes miss the twin towers or the hijacking fails? Won't it look a bit silly if we are forced to just blow up a building for no reason at all?

Crony 2: We'll just blame terrorists.

Crony 1: But logistically its not possiblt to blow up a building that size in one act. It need months and months of work.

Crony 2: You worry too much. We've got people on the inside in the media. It will be right.

Crony 1: Okay then. lets do it.

Brilliant!

This is exactly what happened, it's so simple!

Case closed!

 

[madhawkboy]

Look at all these crazy coincidence theorist.

 

[Kellythatsit]

What happened to the plane that hit wtc7?

Oh wai...

What happened to the hundreds of tonnes of explosives that surely must have been involved. Yet no trace has been found at the site . . .


. . . oh sorry I forgot the microscopic "iron spheres" LOL

 

[Daytripper]

That they also brought down the twin towers. Unless you think a skyscraper of that calibre can fall at that velocity due to bent (not melted) metal as the government and others claim.

Like Ventura claims he believes the government knew what was happening (govt documents indicate they knew details as early as August 6th) and just dramatised the event. Do you really think a war would of started if planes flew into buildings and they started on fire and that was it? I doubt it would of

So let me get this straight - they also wired up the twin towers because the sight of them being rammed into by two passenger laden commercial aircraft would not be enough to prompt outrage from the American public ?

And then they wired up WTC7 for good measure.

Do you have any understanding of how stupid this sounds ?

Regardless questions are being dodged. How did those three buildings collapse that quickly due to fire?

Dodged ????

Its really not rocket science. Two commercial aircraft crashed into a building. Fire spread quickly due to the jet fuel. The structures weakened enough for the buildings to collapse.

 

[vealesy]

Hundreds of tonnes?

Lol.

 

[Kellythatsit]

So let me get this straight - they also wired up the twin towers because the sight of them being rammed into by two passenger laden commercial aircraft would not be enough to prompt outrage from the American public ?

And then they wired up WTC7 for good measure.

Do you have any understanding of how stupid this sounds ?

. . . and don't forget to crash another plane in the middle of f*****g nowhere.

Just wouldn't have received any of the publicity it got without that plane crash in the middle of f*****g nowhere!

Hey, wait, maybe that plane was supposed to crash into wtc7 but the hijacker/cia operatives got lost. They had to improvise by crashing the plane into an abandoned field and wire up the building with explosives in the matter of a few hours (tough job but in the confusion I'm sure no one would have noticed several tonnes of explosives being strapped to the buildings supports when the firefighters, police and media had their backs turned)

 

[Daytripper]

Hundreds of tonnes?

Lol.

Seeing as you're the logistics expert then, what would be involved in blowing up a 47 story building that has to fall exactly into its own footprint - Remember this is vitally important....

 

[vealesy]

Apparantly its now several tonnes only.

 

[Kellythatsit]

Apparantly its now several tonnes only.

being as it didn't exist in the first place it is all elementary . . .

 

[Coledinho]

Seeing as you're the logistics expert then, what would be involved in blowing up a 47 story building that has to fall exactly into its own footprint - Remember this is vitally important....

Jesse Ventura is the logistics expert infact hence why he was asked to write the book

 

[exe ex machina]

Some evidence re: WTC

* Ground Zero burning for months at high temperature (thermite)
* Steel buildings have never collapsed from harder/longer burning fires, let alone free fall of WTC127.
* Jet fuel cannot burn at a temperature to melt steel.
* Both fireballs from planes in WTC12 extinguished quickly (black smoke, fire suffocated).
* Numerous video/audio and firemen accounts of bomb detonation in basement, and timed demolition explosions in floors.
* Molten steel flowing from towers.
* WTC12 disintegrated into utter dust and small shards (ie, explosions)
* Footprint of WTC12 had shifted many inches (ie, basement bomb)

Some evidence re: Pentagon

* Impact hole dimensions vs Boeing dimensions
* Impact hole a 'perfect' circle thru C, D, E concrete walls.
* "Plane vaporized human remains found" (impossible)
* Most fortified place with CCTV cameras, all footage confiscated/destroyed, none released showing Boeing impact
* Plane remains found are identical to the A3-Skywarrior drone military model. image
* Pentagon rings/exit hole are consistent with missile rings/exit holes (see Bosnia)
* Pictures tell a thousand words...

Ie...the expanse of the Boeing supposedly vaporizing within contact of the length of that first E wall, yet turned into a small hard enough projectile puncturing 'perfectly' thru two more walls. Only a missile can do that.

---Haven't touched on Shanksville.

 

[tombomb]

Sorry - this thread is moving pretty quickly, but because I think that all these 9/11 conspiracies are a complete load of bs - is someone suggesting I should read a book by former WWF wrestler Jesse Ventura to get the truth?!

Am I the only one seeing the irony there?

 

[Kellythatsit]

Jesse Ventura is the logistics expert infact hence why he was asked to write the book

Oh cool!

Did you happen to read that document by those other experts the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)?

Their book is free . . .

 

[Coledinho]

. . . and don't forget to crash another plane in the middle of f*****g nowhere.

Just wouldn't have received any of the publicity it got without that plane crash in the middle of f*****g nowhere!

Hey, wait, maybe that plane was supposed to crash into wtc7 but the hijacker/cia operatives got lost. They had to improvise by crashing the plane into an abandoned field and wire up the building with explosives in the matter of a few hours (tough job but in the confusion I'm sure no one would have noticed several tonnes of explosives being strapped to the buildings supports when the firefighters, police and media had their backs turned)

Everyone knows Al Qaeda did it and it was terrorists. Im not disputing that. Im saying the government knew what was happening and didnt prevent it.

 

[Kellythatsit]

Sorry - this thread is moving pretty quickly, but because I think that all these 9/11 conspiracies are a complete load of bs - is someone suggesting I should read a book by former WWF wrestler Jesse Ventura to get the truth?!

Am I the only one seeing the irony there?

No, but these are the "experts" you must read to get to the truth of what happened!