Because the ACC weren't investigating the the sports scientists at the other clubs.
boom
Ill see myself out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Because the ACC weren't investigating the the sports scientists at the other clubs.
It shouldn't be the AFL that investigates, either.The AFL won't investigate. No surprises. But it's not the AFL that should investigate. It's ASADA. There is a clear case for further investigation.
I think the odd email to ASADA asking them to address this couldn't hurt, personally...
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Exactly.
It's time for ASADA to step up and do their job, with no fear or favour
be that as it may, ASADA are supposed to be above that... that's the point. Let's see...As much as I'd like for this to happen, we all know there is a slim to no chance. The whole Australian sporting community only wanted a scapegoat, Essendon for the AFL and Cronulla for the NRL. unless there is overwhelming evidence that the ACC, ASADA, AFL or NRL can't ignore, we won't be seeing any other clubs facing charges
be that as it may, ASADA are supposed to be above that... that's the point. Let's see...
To whom it may concern,
Whilst it has no doubt not escaped your attention, I write to you regarding the allegations of medium to high supplement use by 12 clubs that lacked a single point of accountability, reported 2 days ago here: http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-10-15/afl-no-needles-policy . I am concerned by supplement use in the AFL, and I am also concerned it could be seen as a cover for the potential use of illegal substances.
As the regulatory body charged with investigating possible incidents of doping, I request that you initiate a full investigation of the supplement use of all 12 clubs. I appreciate that your resources must be stretched by the events of the past 9 months and that this may take time, but I feel it is critical for the confidence of the Australian sporting public that these allegations are properly looked in to.
I support a clean and drug free sporting landscape, and I would appreciate any confirmation of whether ASADA will examine this issue.
Best regards,

FWIW...
asada@asada.gov.au
I'm sure they would welcome the input of any concerned citizens, and we know on BigFooty we are the most concerned of all citizens![]()
The bit that stuns me is, does anyone seriously believe that the problem of PEDs in AFL is fixed if you nail one club to the wall and leave everyone else be? All it teaches any wrongdoers that avoid sanction is, if you're crafty enough and don't get caught in the act, then you'll get away with it.
The 'head on a stick' approach is great for the denizens to lap up and for the AFL to win the public relations war by convincing everyone that the problem has been quashed, but the reality is, unless you tackle the problem at the grassroots and much more extensively, it will rear its head again sooner or later.
Along similar lines, what about all the journos (if you can call them that) who were trying to claim the glory for releasing various bombshells (as they like to call them) throughout the Essendon situation? Surely it would be in their interests to be getting to the bottom of this kind of thing, especially after the moralising by a number of them over EFC?
Unless of course, they are just acting like the AFL patsies that they revealed themselves to be these last 6 months. Not that they'll ever admit to getting inside information etc etc. Don't bite the hand that feeds you, etc, and so on, so forth, etc etc.
To whom it may concern,
After “the blackest day in sport” announcement by the Federal Government in February, followed by the investigation into Essendon Football Club, Cronulla Rugby League club and others, I was of the impression that Australian government and ASADA was doing its utmost to seek out and punish those who have found to have breached the WADA code and clean up Australian sport from the use of illegal supplements going forwards.
It was therefore something of a surprise when, on 15th October 2013, it was reported that 12 AFL clubs have medium to high supplement use, club documentation of supplement use was inadequate, and that clubs lacked a single point of accountability. Further reports have advised some clubs taking up to 40 supplements. To me, the reports sound eerily similar to what the Essendon Football Club is being investigated (and have already been charged by the AFL) over.
Imagine my further surprise when the AFL said they were “confident” that the other clubs had not done anything wrong. Essendon were “confident” they had done no wrong but this confidence appeared to be misplaced.
I am very concerned for firstly Australian Rules football going forwards if this is the attitude the league’s governing body has taken. They are putting in reactive measures now which does nothing to ensure past results are based on a fair playing field given some clubs may have taken illegal substances to gain an advantage.
My concern goes further than just AFL though, and to the heart of Australian sport in general, from grass roots through to the professional leagues. The professional leagues should be setting the precedent by which all other levels of sport can follow. By the AFL seemingly sweeping these latest allegations under the carpet I am concerned the wrong message is being sent.
I am interested to know whether ASADA intends on seeking clarification from the AFL to understand why it is so confident that nothing untoward has happened at the other 11 AFL clubs. I would like to see a drug free sport going forwards where results are decided on natural ability and talent, but my confidence that past results have been obtained in this manner are low based on the reasoning I have provided. Surely it is in the best interests of Australian sport to get to the bottom of it and deter any clubs of any sporting code from going down this path again.
Regards,
To whom it may concern,
I'm pretty sure Hawthorn are on the juice.
Regards,
I mentioned yesterday that I reckon in the meeting of the club presidents an amnesty was provided whereby the AFL would do everything in its power to protect all other clubs from an EFC type investigation in return for their support.
Didn't Paul Little attend that meeting?
FWIW...
asada@asada.gov.au
I'm sure they would welcome the input of any concerned citizens, and we know on BigFooty we are the most concerned of all citizens![]()

Exactly, I want 11 other clubs fined 2 million, lose the first two rounds if draft picks for two years and ineligible for final series in 2014.The penalties Essendon received were governance related. Here we have examples of governance issues at 12 other clubs, and...
Exactly, I want 11 other clubs fined 2 million, lose the first two rounds if draft picks for two years and ineligible for final series in 2014.
GWS might make finals in their third year if they aren't one of the eleven clubs, clearly they are better than GC Suns because they did make finals in their third year!
Can't wait for the first Baker & McKenzie article. These guys are the best investigative journos ever