Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Gumby and 48 for 37 is probably going to happen, but Gumby and 26 for 17 would be better
Do you think we may want to trade pick 26 to Brisbane for Docherty? Trump the Blues pick by 5 and piss them off big time?
The funniest post was how essendon's board crameri thread is a long as ours so they clearly rate him. Our thread took 4 years to get there, their's 4 weeks!Dogs board will be doing backflips
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
We look like serious dickheads at the trade table now. Playing hard ball, sitting on it, trying to involve 3rd parties, then going ahead with the deal that could've been done on day 1.
that, but would Docherty be like a new recruit and the other picks are a rookie upgrade and stab in the dark? And if we had to let one more player go that would most likely be Davey? We can always redraft him? I know that that would mean we have effectively not drafted anyone new to our club this year, but the players we have brought in are ready made, meaning they don't need that initial development first year players require.... Taking into account next year we do get that pick at the end of the first round. Just putting it out there, pick 26 for Docherty would be better then a first year player, well it would be a safer betThat means our 3 draft picks will be 58 (if that's what we get for Gumby), 66 and 84. No thanks
Thoughts on picking up Jay Kennedy-Harris with pick 26?
Hopefully you get more luck cause Id really like to hear what people think. Personally, I see him as perfect for one of our real needs - that smart, crumming small forward that can push into the midfieldWe look like serious dickheads at the trade table now. Playing hard ball, sitting on it, trying to involve 3rd parties, then going ahead with the deal that could've been done on day 1.
48 is already gone...
imagine trying to involve 3rd parties?!! The disgrace! How dare they take their allocated time to explore a better result.How do we look like dickheads? We tried to get a better deal, which was our right, and probably spent the time trying to change Crameri's mind about leaving. Nothing gained or lost by waiting here.
We look like serious dickheads at the trade table now. Playing hard ball, sitting on it, trying to involve 3rd parties, then going ahead with the deal that could've been done on day 1.
Would pick 26 on Dayle Garlett be too high?
Not in the slightest, if he's available then we should definitely grab him. Dodoro has said we'll take the "best player available" when it's our turn to pick, and on talent alone in the last 2 years he's been touted as a potential top 10 selection.
We won't get him.
Not in the slightest, if he's available then we should definitely grab him. Dodoro has said we'll take the "best player available" when it's our turn to pick, and on talent alone in the last 2 years he's been touted as a potential top 10 selection.
what a load of rubbish
How do we look like dickheads? We tried to get a better deal, which was our right, and probably spent the time trying to change Crameri's mind about leaving. Nothing gained or lost by waiting here.
That is so dumb and really showing you have no idea how trading works. Yes we got the same deal we could have gotten on day 1, but it would have been truly embarrassing to just accept it rather than trying to get as much as possible. We always knew pick 26 was there, it wasn't at risk of being taken away. They tried to keep him, tried everything to put together a deal that was best for us.
By the sounds of it you want us to be bitches and accept whatever the other clubs offer.
hurlygurdy said: ↑
Don't know whether i'm rationalizing reality or not, but all in all i'm really happy to replace Crameri with Chapman + 26. That pick mitigates the sanctions and looks after our future, while Chapman provides us with a forward who has a half decent chance of performing in the second half of the season (unlike Crameri).Perspective, I like it.
That is so dumb and really showing you have no idea how trading works. Yes we got the same deal we could have gotten on day 1, but it would have been truly embarrassing to just accept it rather than trying to get as much as possible. We always knew pick 26 was there, it wasn't at risk of being taken away. They tried to keep him, tried everything to put together a deal that was best for us.
By the sounds of it you want us to be bitches and accept whatever the other clubs offer.
I hope we do, but you're probably right. It'd take Jobe's approval for us to take him and I'm not sure we'd get it.