Yet you are already shouting Dank and Robinson are rogues from the rooftops
How dare he support his club against all others.
Shame on you mxett
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yet you are already shouting Dank and Robinson are rogues from the rooftops
Great in retrospect
I've answered this question many times. Why would they sue when their advice is no banned or dangerous substances were used?
good point! Why would I, a supporter of an uninvolved club, be so emotionally invested in this saga?
Maybe ask yourself this question
Protect their own!.As are the AFL, who undertook a 6 month investigation into the saga. At least they would have a reasonable understanding of what occurred.
He seems to forget however the AFL also uncovered a damming lot of evidence against Essendon. Including Hird and the players.Protect their own!.
In this case,a future Hall of Famer!.
I'm a Foamer!!.
Sets those principles then allows a convicted drug dealer supply the club. Yeah ok then
I'm a FoamerHe seems to forget however the AFL also uncovered a damming lot of evidence against Essendon. Including Hird and the players.
I would like to toastI'm a Foamer
James has a boner
I prefer Casey Stoner
Although NGV has nothing on NOMA
I know this will be deleted
So I will never complete it
The invoice shows substances were given to players that were not on the consents. We also know the clubs medical staff didnt approve them. IF they were banned or dangerous this was a rogue action because it was against the clubs CLEAR directions.
I can't spell it out any clearer than that.
Claiming there is no proof Hird didnt approve this action is completely baseless
"We obviously won't train properly, it's all about recovery; it's all about the high performance guys, we will leave the guys in their hands."
Id say you are. Going rogue doesnt automatically mean using banned or unsafe substances. It could mean they used substances that werent intended for use in sport and not agreed to by players and staff, but thankfully proven safe and compliant.So they didn't go rogue? I'm so confused.
He trusted Dank and Robinson to do the job they were employed to do and help players recover within the framework set by the club - compliant and safe. Not only that, players signed consents clearly indicating their intention was to ONLY be given WADA compliant substances. That isnt really a hard ask is it???No dear mxett.
You'll recall the period prior to the 2012 Anzac Day game. This has always been of major interest to the investigators. This is when the mystery Mexican substance was used.
At the time James Hird said:
This means that Senior Coach James Hird placed his authority in the hands of the "high performance guys".
And if the high performance guys went and maybe injected 34 players with an S4 banned myststain inhibitor, then that is Hird's problem.
Hird chose to delegate responsibility. He must wear the consequences of that decision.
He trusted Dank and Robinson to do the job they were employed to do and help players recover within the framework set by the club - compliant and safe. Not only that, players signed consents clearly indicating their intention was to ONLY be given WADA compliant substances. That isnt really a hard ask is it???
He trusted Dank and Robinson to do the job they were employed to do and help players recover within the framework set by the club - compliant and safe. Not only that, players signed consents clearly indicating their intention was to ONLY be given WADA compliant substances. That isnt really a hard ask is it???
He trusted Dank and Robinson to do the job they were employed to do and help players recover within the framework set by the club - compliant and safe. Not only that, players signed consents clearly indicating their intention was to ONLY be given WADA compliant substances. That isnt really a hard ask is it???
We are all awaiting an result. Until that time I'm not going to rely on innuendo and half truths to sink people I respect and trust. However, when one of the bodies who investigated the issue has essentially said Dank went rogue and it wasnt Hird's or the clubs intention to cheat, I believe this because to me it is part of the result.I guess being a hypocrite is ok and we shouldn't call him out on it
We are all awaiting an result. Until that time I'm not going to rely on innuendo and half truths to sink people I respect and trust. However, when one of the bodies who investigated the issue has essentially said Dank went rogue and it wasnt Hird's or the clubs intention to cheat, I believe this because to me it is part of the result.
So no, I dont think I'm being hypocritical
AOD excepted of course. Even AD confirmed there is confusion over AOD. The club believe the thymosin wasnt TB4. The mexican drug wasnt on the consents nor approved by the clubBut the consents had AOD on them didn't they? That's NOT WADA complaint.
Oh, and also there was apparently no mention of which variety of Thymosin they intended... Ummm, no mention of muscular dystrophy drugs from Mexico...
Ok, now I'm confused, how did the consents "clearly indicate their intention was to ONLY be given WADA compliant substances"?
So you agree it wasnt Hird or Essendons intention to cheat?Yep, and bad luck, he stuffed up. He employed the wrong people.
The buck stops with him.
I believe he even famously said as much once.
I also think that Mr Dank is not going to wear the whole "rogue" thing. I reckon that's why he's so desperate to get into Federal Court.
Because he knows it is a hell of a lot easier for ASADA to just pour a giant bucket of crap on him and make it all go away.
The AFL investigated the issue. Arent they a body?The body who investigated the issue have never said such a thing though
The AFL investigated the issue. Arent they a body?
So you agree it wasnt Hird or Essendons intention to cheat?
AOD excepted of course. Even AD confirmed there is confusion over AOD. The club believe the thymosin wasnt TB4. The mexican drug wasnt on the consents nor approved by the club
So you agree it wasnt Hird or Essendons intention to cheat?
Because then all of the substances used would have to be listed in a court of law and that is the last thing EFC wantSo why has the EFC not gone after the so called rogue employes. I would sue the s**t out of them if I employed them.
Because then all of the substances used would have to be listed in a court of law and that is the last thing EFC want
You see Mxett, i can't believe that a whole team of players would be that stupid.Id say you are. Going rogue doesnt automatically mean using banned or unsafe substances. It could mean they used substances that werent intended for use in sport and not agreed to by players and staff, but thankfully proven safe and compliant.